this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
140 points (92.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"“If President Trump committed a heinous act worthy of disqualification, he should be disqualified for the sake of protecting our hallowed democratic system, regardless of whether citizens may wish to vote for him in Colorado,”

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday barred Trump from the state’s ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits anyone who swore an oath to support the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it from holding office.

“It is imperative for the political stability of the U.S. to get a definitive judicial resolution of these questions as soon as possible,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, wrote shortly after the ruling.

Trump’s lawyers have argued that, technically, the president isn’t an officer “under the United States” — that it’s a legal term of art that refers to government appointees and therefore the provision doesn’t apply to him.

The majority opinion said the Colorado Supreme Court did have jurisdiction to decide the matter, that the presidency was clearly an office in the United States and that Trump’s actions related to the Capitol attack fit the insurrection clause, in part because he urged his supporters during a rally beforehand to fight.

That included a week of testimony from a handful of police and protesters who were at the Jan. 6 attack, two constitutional law professors and experts on a president’s emergency powers and on right-wing political speech..

“If President Trump committed a heinous act worthy of disqualification, he should be disqualified for the sake of protecting our hallowed democratic system, regardless of whether citizens may wish to vote for him in Colorado,” Samour concluded.


The original article contains 1,432 words, the summary contains 239 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Should amend it so that people who write-in a candidate disqualified from the ballot for such reasons should also be disqualified as voters for the next two cycles.

edit: that goes for these buttholes as well

https://lemmy.world/post/9831042

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If he's disqualified for the office, those ballots will be void.

You can write in Arnold Schwarzenegger and he could get a majority, but those votes would all be void, since he is not a natural-born citizen.

What's the saying that the Republicans love so much?

The US is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic.

There is only one way to peacefully change the constitution - and that's through an amendment.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

The naturalization clause of the constitution for presidential eligibility has never been tested, and actually is quite a complex interpretation, so it’s not absolute to say Arnie would be ineligible.