this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

The Agora

1708 readers
1 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should sh.itjust.works preemptively defederate from Threads?

Threads is the not-so-new ~~reddit-like~~ twitter-like public forum platform by Meta, the same commercial company behind internet behemoths like Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp. They're working on ActivityPub integration so that they can bridge (federate?) with the fediverse. As far as I know, the focus is on Mastodon instances, but in the future that could include Lemmy instances too.

Some have raised the question, worried about the future of the fediverse or even claiming that it goes against its definition.

What do you think should be done?

EDIT: correction

EDIT.2: The Vote is on! Go make your voice heard. You have until Friday the 29th.

Fediverse instances' status on federation with Threads

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Stay federated and if it's annoying, then defederate.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Defederate pls

[–] ruplicant@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

my take on it is that i am completely against any kind of bridging between the platforms. i do think the fediverse in general is in danger, by being a victim of the "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" strategy

as many on lemmy, i use this platform because of its decentralized, open-source, not-for-profit nature, and think the whole fediverse community would be in jeopardy if we don't act

Exactly. I'm almost always against defederation, but the risk of EEE is why I'm in favor of preemptively defederating.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Defederation is meaningless, what matters is the dev side. Federating doesn't give them anything they couldn't get other ways for slightly more effort. The problems come if you allow contributions the greater community doesn't want to the code itself.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Just like every other time these things have been posted, I wholly oppose defederation.

I have no interest in welcoming Facebook/Meta/Zuckerburg's Big Goddamn Fucky Wucky Company to the Fediverse. I would vote to defederate from Threads and any instance federated with them.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If and when Meta becomes “federated”, I 100% will be on team DEFEDERATE.

[–] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Yep. Defederate.

[–] TrojanHam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I'm for the preemptive de-federation.

[–] DeepChill@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I’m in favour of anything that prevents Meta’s enshittification of everything.

[–] spiderkle@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Everyone must only answer this question for themselves: Do you want to have extra content at the cost of potentially more ads & tracking? Because that's their current monetization model.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How would another instance inject ads and tracking into this instance? If that's possible, then that's a serious security issue far bigger than Facebook, and is the real thing we should be discussing

Sponsored posts.

[–] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The fun option would be to flood threads with shitposts and make them defederate from us when they start to lose advertisers

They will just hide that content in their platform

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

Don't defederate immediately, but do it automatically three months after threads goes live if users don't explicitly vote to keep it around. I wouldn't mind seeing how it goes at first.

i think just treat them like anybody else

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm taking off my admin hat and commenting as a user...

One minor correction to OP's post: Threads is a X/Twitter clone, not a Reddit clone.

I'm in the wait-and-see camp. If Threads someday links to Lemmy, and if it becomes problematic for the function or culture of the platform, then I will be in favor of cutting them off.
As @ryathal@sh.itjust.works mentioned, the real risk is that Meta starts steering Lemmy development in its favor. I don't foresee that happening given that dessalines and nutomic oversee code contributions, and they certainly won't allow it.

As an aside, I'm not convinced Threads will last long to begin with. It isn't looking like the X killer that Meta seemed to be hoping for. Meta has been trying to artificially drive engagement by creating shadow accounts for Facebook/Instagram users, and sticking Threads posts in people's Facebook feeds. Integrating with Mastodon feels like a further attempt to entice Meta users to adopt a microblogging app that nobody asked for. At this rate it may fizzle and die before they ever get around to interacting with Lemmy.