this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
453 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25117 readers
2034 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 95 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We should try making bribery illegal again. That would be fun.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Illegal for the people doing and taking the bribe, with real teeth.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The thing is- at least with SCOTUS justices- we can make absolutely anything illegal regarding them and they can just turn around and say, "fuck you, what are you going to do about it?" And the rest of the government says, "uh... nothing I guess?"

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Genuinely how is this not considered illegal in the US?
If you tried this in most parts of Europe you'd be charged for committing bribery

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The Supreme Court of the United States has decided that corporations are people and money is free speech.

We have become what Benjamin Franklin feared we would become. He could see the future:

“In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no form of government, but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered; and believe further, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government.”

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The founders feared political factions forming above all and basically designed the government around not allowing factions to take absolute power, like separating the presidential office from the executive branch etc. and not even making the position clear. Presidents have basically pushed on the limits and defined the office over the years and political factions formed around economic interests of the people because of course they would. At first you basically needed a minimum amount of worked land to even vote in most states, men's suffrage happened long before women's. America was basically designed as a free real estate project and sort of still is.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure the founders kind of assumed we'd have a couple of revolutions by now

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

when the people shall have become so corrupted as to need a despotic government.

See that’s interesting. Franklin’s talking about society getting fucked up and naturally spawning a bad government above itself as a necessary part of its own structure.

It’s not just that people get corrupt and form a despotic government, it’s that the world getting fucked up means despots are more likely to be liked and desired by people seeking safety from the corruption around them.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So the courts are illegitimate. Got it.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ll tell you what we do. We turn all of Sunnyvale into an all-inclusive resort and casino, we charge at the door, and we all the liquor and free dope you want. Then we get those judge cocksuckers to come out and party with us so they think we’re cool, and we can pass any laws we want.

It’ll fuckin work, I know it will boys. We just gotta come together and make er happen, like in the old days.

[–] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It’s not rocket appliances.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Nothing. As usual.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's simple: stop going to court, paying taxes or supporting them in any way. Band together with like-minded people under new collectively agreed upon laws you actually will follow. Train yourselves to fight for when the thugs of the old system inevitably do come at your door. Buy land and set up intentional communities, and start putting money toward buying land in the former counties to regain control. Bribe officials in the old counties to facilitate this.

That's the bare minimum of what we should be doing right now, honestly. The bare, bare minimum.

Really we should be banding together and overthrowing those old governments.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you're kinda underestimating the power of organized, state sanctioned violence.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're underestimating the ability for people to organize and fight off tyrannical governments. It's literally how the U.S. became a country at all.

Have more faith in yourself and stop being a coward.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yea just stop paying taxes guys… duh

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

It has always been this way.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And have been since at least Dred Scott.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah Scalia died while on one of these trips.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

good to know even the rich sometimes get bad coke

[–] Zolidus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

You don't say....

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did the conservative judges rule that money equal speech and corporations are people? So the richer you are, the more speech you have and the "poors" are free to use all the money they have-- oh the poors have no money? Then they have no speech.

Bad ruling for democracy. Shame!

[–] ApostleO@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

"b-b-but destroying democracy isn't illegal! stop oppressing me!"