this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
95 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

10233 readers
614 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 years ago

You can build as many houses as you want but until you restrict investment firms and landlords buying all of them you won't put a dent in the problem.

[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s exciting to see that the government could cut up to a year of development time with these blueprints. I’m curious what they’ll come up with that reflects the best of what modern BIM, digital twin, offsite manufacturing, CLT, and modular construction technologies can do.

Hopefully there will be a variety of to choose from for different kinds of environments and tastes. Personally I’d like to see some 6 storey apartments complexes, designed to accommodate car free lifestyles.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Me too. I was under the impression, though, that a minimum amount of space for parking is a requirement of all residentially zoned land, regardless of intended use. Zoning laws might need changing if I'm remembering that right.

[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

This is still only one piece of the puzzle though. To restore affordability it would make sense to prioritize building and converting more existing stock to non-market housing so there’s competitive pressure on the remaining/existing landlords to keep rent low.

Vienna has done a wonderful job to show the world what’s possible after a century of continuous improvements with non market housing.

[–] SideshowBoz@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Truly feels like a “we’ve tried nothing, and we’re out of ideas!” situation, it’s almost comical.

It seems like these are blueprints for single family homes, so we’ll be stuck with car-based city designs that aren’t helping us solve the housing crisis in the first place…

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Seems like a pretty good plan, hope the new designs are energy efficient!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So are the demographics (on a statistical level) finally in favor of this?

Edit: I don't get how they ever weren't? Actual house/property deed holders are a minority of the population, can someone please dispute this (without citing the bullshit hatchet-job StatsCanada bs that a majority of Canadians are property owners regardless of their mortgage/deed-holding status --> kids who are getting kicked out at 18 are hOmEoWnErS o_O 🙄)

[–] Radicalized@lemmy.one -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s not a supply issue — there’s enough empty homes in Canada right now to house every single person in this country.

[–] ElderMillennial@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago
[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Even if true, if they are not in the city where your job is then it does you no good.