this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

askchapo

22717 readers
1 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i've seen this phrase used around here in a few variations and it rarely gets called out as problematic. i really don't think its ok so i thought i'd ask: does hexbear think its ok? i can understand and support the use of violence against fascists and colonizers, but genocide is really their thing. i don't see why it makes sense to use it even as a rhetorical device. why doesn't this get called out? is genocide so normalized in casual conversation that it doesn't register or what?

edit: ~~i have all the [he/him]s on the website telling me that this is actually a very funny joke. i still don't like it or get it, but i've had my fill of arguing with y'all so thanks for the info. i can see why nobody calls this one out. it kinda fucking sucks. i'll just go ahead and block people who post this type of joke and go on my merry way.~~

now that everyone has had a chance to chime in, i'm just going to add some context for y'all

  1. ~~most of the responses i got at first were from [he/him]s which is why i said the above. nothing against any gender, just what i saw.~~ it wasn't my intention to misgender anyone sorry if it came across that way. i really meant it as an observation of who was jumping in to reply at the start of the thread, but i didn't realize how it could be perceived in other contexts.
  2. i'm not american. i'm technically a US citizen, but i have much more significant cultural ties to SV, MX, and separately and to a lesser extent NA indigenous community. i don't always get where western people are coming from. i like the overall tone of hexbear maybe i just don't how imaginary genocide is supposed to be cathartic. i apologize if it came across like i'm trying to tone police y'all. that's really not my jam, but y'all do seem a little pre-disposed to getting offended when your little jokes are questioned.
  3. i still don't like the joke, so i'm going to remove them from my feed. if y'all don't have an issue with it that's fine. i was just trying to get a feel for what y'all think. the push back was a little upsetting after the day i had yesterday, but i'm over it now. i can live with curating my own experience based on my personal taste.
  4. i haven't been that articulate, but i think my feelings are best summarized by this reply:

As someone that does find the joke funny, upon some reflection i have realised that it is an inapropiate joke, genocide is a horrific thing and to make light of it by making it a subject of a joke is in bad taste the same way that jokes about sexual assault are in bad taste, we rightfuly look down on redditors for the latter but allow the former

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anonochronomus@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DEATH TO AMERIKKKA. DEATH TO THE GREAT SATAN.

[–] voight@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

UNLIMITED EXORCISMS ON THE WHITE HOUSE AND CAPITOL BUILDING

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What not reading Pedagogy of the Oppressed does to motherfuckers.

[–] xj9@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

its been on my list. i'll bump it up, but i don't think it'll make the joke funny.

I don't like it and I don't think it does our ideals any service. At the same time, I don't want to normalize tone policing and I think the sentiment of rage behind it is valid. And rage is not something that is good to sweep under the rug.

I hope eventually people lose their taste for this particular meme and move on to something a little more tasteful. Until then, I scroll.

[–] a_blanqui_slate@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Good, bad, apart from the original comic, it just isn't funny.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

Im with you. Never been a fan of that joke. Dont like edgy killing based humor in general.

[–] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eternal 9/11 or 7 Octobers on the first world

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are a concerning amount of people here that are mostly here for the shitposting and in-jokes and are otherwise terrible people. I think a lot of the comments in here reinforce that.

The other lemmys when bitching and moaning about hexbear were basically doing a zionist projection game, but between us cool folks, we do have a bit of an issue with the types in it only for the memes.

Not long ago someone posted about meeting up with someone irl and they ended up being a creepy chaser or something.

The joke is overused because its just a bunch of un-creative posters repeating what they see. I think its tacky but also I think there's room for occasional usage. It shouldn't be taken seriously but it should be used in moments of serious exasperation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

I haven't seen that here. Must not be as active on this site as I thought. But yeah I'm not a huge fan of that kind of talk. It isn't constructive and is excessively edgy.

[–] Teapot@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unlimited genocide on chapo.chat concern trolls

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Petition to change it to "unlimited coups on the first world" or something.

Closer to the actual sentiment and sounds cooler anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›