this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
268 points (75.8% liked)

Political Memes

9200 readers
2345 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

specifically : a historical process by which the semantic and connotative status of a word tends to decline

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marietta_man@yall.theatl.social 120 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

In what world is the Wall Street Journal “liberal media”? The same WSJ owned/run by Rupert Murdoch and his son? Or is there another one?

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

The word liberal lost all meaning in the media as soon as Trump started misusing to attack his enemies and every outlet just ran with it.

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thought Bezos bought it as a mouthpiece?

Edit: ah wait it was the Washington Post

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

Wall Street is in New York. New York is liberal AF.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 91 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Liberal media

Wall Street Journal

Pick one.

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 82 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Why is it liberal media when wall Street journal is right leaning and Adam Kirsch doesn't have any posted political affiliations?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 73 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Because OP is the worst. Perpetually online and perpetually unpopular

I saw this photograph of a printed article someone posted earlier. The comments called that person out for cropping out the actual article, which was measured and nuanced, and using the headline as ragebait. Dude here just elevating to the next level of ignorant

Here's the actual article

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Because TokenBoomer is a rightwing shill, posts nothing but anti-leftwing stuff pretending its all #BothSides.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Everything I've seen from OP leads me to believe they are leftist. Care to cite an example of them shilling for the right?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Centrists have this thing where they accuse anyone to their left of being all the way to their right.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

neoliberalism is right wing.

democrats as not leftists.

[–] marietta_man@yall.theatl.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Looks like a typical agitprop/anger amplifier news spammer

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That's a lot of labels

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guess it says something about me that I enjoy all their posts lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yo peep their post history.

• Pro-Obama voter (plan saved her life)

• Capitalism lead to modern slavery in chocolate production

• Police kill 10k family dogs a year

Pro-Obama. Anti-Capitalism. Anti-Police Brutality.

Maybe you’re thinking of someone else or I didn’t dig deep enough?

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He sanitizes his post history. I've had several interactions with him to the point that I remember his name. Everything in my inbox that has his name says that content can't be found.

[–] Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's wrong with people deleting posts that they don't agree with / don't want public?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

"liberal" is used here as in neoliberal, which is rightwing and capitalist.

also in the us, democrats lean slightly right of center.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alertsleeper@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (8 children)

it says the term has lost impact, I agree. Doesn;t mean it should be 'retired' but I get the point.

Other words have also lost impact. 'Democracy' comes to mind. I live in a dictatorship that on a daily basis call themselves a Peoples' Democracy, and half the world agrees

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Liberalism is another one. From Wikipedia

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.

It's bizarre to see knee-jerk reactions to something if it is described as "a tennet of liberalism". They will rail against the values of the founding fathers who were, in this sense, liberals. Now I don't care too much arguments of founding principles, but to see these people, who claim the constitution is inspired by God, bash liberalism in the context of governing philosophies is infuriating.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] alertsleeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Nope. I'll give you a hint. One of the three main communist dictatorship in Latin America (currently)

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think the wrong use of the word has led to it losing impact, just people are more comfortable using it. A lot of people think genocide is like, the Holocaust, but nobody actually needs to die for something to be genocide. It can refer to the destruction of culture or religion within a specific group as well. Like sending first nation children to residential schools. Even if no one died in that process it was genocide by trying to eliminate the culture.

People are just more comfortable with using the word as it is defined as, rather than just the really treacherous stuff like Nazi Germany and Rwanda.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I like how the C became a copyright symbol.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "no".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well WSJ is center or center left depending on the day and who you ask. That's the point though, to lend credibility and provide cover for their solidly right editorial/opinion pieces.

OPs meme is the perfect example of how this is supposed to work, confusing the source and shifting the window with people that aren't aware. "This is a liberal media news source, so this must be an accepted opinion in liberal media circles"

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

WSJ was center-right before it got bought up by the Murdochs, and while its news coverage hasn't drifted too far post-acquisistion, its editorial page has slumped noticeably in the direction of Fox News.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago

The WSJ editorial staff called a bike share program "totalitarian communism". The program was run by CitiBank.

They are unhinged conservatives. They just don't always let their privates hang out the way Alex Jones does.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is WSJ liberal? I thought it was right wing corpo propaganda?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

News? Centrist (e.g., see their 2021 coverage of The Facebook Files).

Opinion? Oh boy...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

"We will do ANYTHING to get this genocide done without akwnowledging it being a genocide."

[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Where does it show WSJ on the newspaper?

load more comments
view more: next ›