movies

22818 readers

5 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

WhyEssEff@hexbear.net

Zoift@hexbear.net

Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

Walk_On@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Grebgreb@hexbear.net

ultraviolet@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

Hot take: "To Have and Have Not" is a far better film than "Casablanca" (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by Great_Leader_Is_Dead@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Come at me old timey film nerd!

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] abc@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Hot take, Singing in the Rain is better than both.

[–] JuryNullification@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

To Have and Have Not is a decent book, and a good song.

[–] HiImThomasPynchon@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

IMO neither have anything on the greatest film ever made: Santa Claus Conquers The Martians

Realtalk, though, To Have and Have Not is a Howard Hawks joint, and that guy probably did more to advance modern cinema than Orson Welles did. My favorite Howard Hawks story is the time he called up Raymon Chandler to ask who the cluprit is in The Big Sleep only foor Chandler to tell him "I don't know."