this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

shitposting

2 readers
2 users here now

August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe. August 12 2036, the heat death of the universe.

founded 2 years ago
 
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That's assuming that those algorithms are coded to be truly neutral reflections of a user's interest, and aren't deliberately weighted to push outrage-inducing (ie. engagement-baiting) content.

I marvel at social media algorithms the same way I marvel at the creation of the atomic bomb. It's fascinating, sure. But to imply that it was designed with neutral motives at heart is dishonest.