this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
778 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

73792 readers
3401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money::Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The damn thing looks like it was rendered in the original quake engine. Fucking quake rally car.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Low poly lookin’ mother fucker

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't see how anyone could take it seriously when the introduction was to show how unbreakable the windows were.

https://youtu.be/BqGf8pqCZi0

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 8 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/BqGf8pqCZi0?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The article talking about a Cybertruck racing a Porsche

Electric motors accelerate cars faster than ones with internal combustion engines, so this wasn’t a fair fight.

Nobody's permitted to compare electric cars with internal combustion because electric is faster? I don't understand the logic.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Because it isn't a real brag. It is an apple to oranges comparison.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 12 points 2 years ago

I feel like this whole article is based on a false premise.

Go to a dealership right now, and try to find any new truck for $36,000. On paper you might be able to get the lowest base model, but in reality good luck with that.

I just checked the dealership near me, and the lowest price for a new vehicle of any kind is 39,400CAD or about 28,000USD. The lowest priced new truck is 66,500CDN, or about 49,300USD.

That's just what the world looks like now thanks to inflation. And that's not a vehicle using expensive battery technology, and that's not a vehicle made out of expensive, difficult to manufacture with stainless steel, it's just the cheapest standard truck at the dealership.

Really, it looks like the cybertruck is about bang on with prices for other EV trucks that aren't made out of entirely stainless steel. Considering that Tesla isn't a budget brand, that doesn't seem unreasonable. Nobody at Tesla is psychic, they couldn't have predicted super high inflation sparked in part due to policies enacted due to a global pandemic, so of course prices rose.

[–] Xenon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

This doesn't look like a car nor a truck it's a combat vehicle. Seriously, who's impressed by Elon's shooting and steel ball demonstrations? In what kind of failed state do these Tesla customers live? With a tank hull for a frame and sharp edges all around this looks like a serious safety hazard for passengers and especially pedestrians outside the car.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't forget in this apocalypse you have reliable charging infrastructure

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

dont tell dale that gasoline goes bad in 3-6 months, ethanol blends in 4-6.

unless someone fires up an oil refinery no one's driving shit.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wood gasification, people will be driving it'll just look like the Beverly hillbillies come to town rather than madmax.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_gas_generator

And yes you can run a car on poop.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Hummers were a thing. I can easily see those same people buying this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

It's shaped like the 1980s Dust Buster.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Why is this thing so goddamn ugly? It's like the designers took all the worst sci-fi vehicles from movies and smushed them into one.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (20 children)

Oh wow, it's actually made from stainless steel and not some shitty mild steel. I should get me one, this would be a lifesaver in Michigan

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Get a DeLorean; it would be more off road capable.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

And you can bet that the specs are "best case" "ideal conditions" as well. The reality will be worse still

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›