this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
21 points (95.7% liked)

UK Politics

4135 readers
165 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full text archive link: https://archive.is/LnBCs

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Politicians are always "what's best for me" instead of "what's best for my constituents". Lol at his dilemma.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

too bad starmer's stance on migration is literally the same thing. is it too much to ask for one party that isn't trying to cater to rabid ~~british xenophobes and racists~~ the working class?

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Pretty pathetic piece imo. There has been 20 letters submitted more or less since Sunak took office. This just looks like Braverman's crew pushing the narrative that they are around, and that the FT is backing them on that. There is nothing in this to substantiate any increased support for Braverman or her cronies.

Article dating 22/10/23 here stating exactly the same narrative.