this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like your thoughts on how you would rank the below scenarios from best to worse, assume draft is with our highest pick:

  1. Fields stays, coaching staff stays, draft other position
  2. Fields stays, new coaching staff, draft other position
  3. Draft new QB, coaching staff stays
  4. Draft new QB, new coaching staff

Mine would be: 2,4,1,3

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scary_xp@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

1 is obviously the only option after the bears win the superbowl this year

[–] lkn240@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

4

Huge gap

3

Huge gap

2

1

[–] Gryffindorq@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

if Caleb Williams stays at USC 1 more year than the 20% chance id go for 4 disappears and im 100% on 2

[–] BRUISE_WILLIS@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who tf starting with 3 here?

[–] theskyalreadyfell217@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

That would infuriate me. How many times would we have to see that not work before they knock that shit off!

[–] TrollTollPayer@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Do you honestly believe Fields would be successful with his 3rd coaching staff in 4 years?

Haven't bears fans seen that that doesn't work?

[–] SD40couple@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Option 4 is the only choice.

[–] dirtimartini69@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] generation_D@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] theskyalreadyfell217@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] whatever12347@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

4,2,3,1 I guess

Replacing the coaches is the top priority--then quarterback.

[–] Nervous-Awareness482@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] GenuineJenius@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Offseason? You want to talk about the offseason?

[–] PeanutBear33@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

New gm, New hc, New qb.

Keep gm, keep hc, keep qb. It will fail and then we'll do the above the year after and finally be in sync.

Everything else is equally as terrible as it keeps gm, hc, and qb out of sync and we continue to play this dumb game of not figuring out more than one thing can be bad at a time

[–] PianoEmeritus@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd go 4, large gap, then 3, 2, 1. 3 is contingent on the defense looking extremely professional the rest of the way and no more big coaching blunders. Eberflus is on thin ice but if the team looks solid outside of shaky passing game production I could humor it.

I don't see any compelling reason for Fields to stay -- I don't want to run it back with this same exact setup again, and I don't see a reason to give him a third coaching staff. It's not viable.

[–] Gleasonryan@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

3 is literally the worst option if we are talking about full on staff retention. Getsy is just dogshit, we would be better off with no OC, no play caller. If we are keeping Flus and just trashing the rest, it’s still a bad option.

[–] Sure_Station9370@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I’m down to just ride the Fields train man. We went from having nothing but Herbert/Fields rushing on offense last year to now having a couple of good linemen and 1 not trash/mediocre receiver. Our center can’t even snap a ball without it going 5 feet off target every play. I dunno if Fields will ever get us to the NFC championship let alone a Super Bowl but I want Harrison across the field from Moore, someone who can snap a fucking ball, and Getsy’s head on a pike before we even address the Fields issue.

[–] FaithfulBarnabas@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Number 3 is what is going to happen and it will be a disaster. Ideally #1 and #4 are the only viable options