this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FickleFred@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I wish this debate wasn't so toxic with everyone taking a hard line stance. I'm kind of in the middle with a foot in both camps.

The way I see it, if you have the 1st or 2nd pick, you should take one of these qb's. You have the chance to reset with a rookie contract and an elite qb prospect with another top 6 pick & probably another 2nd from trading Fields to surround him with. Set him up w/ a really solid supporting cast from the start as opposed to the usual development in a shit situation. Our roster is really rounding into form and we have some promising young players.

I love Fields and I think you can win with him with the right team and offense. If the pick isnt a top 2 pick, im fine rolling it back with him. But he's been inconsistent and left you with questions and you cant pass up this opportunity without real conviction on the qb, which he hasnt given us. Not to mention you'd have to pay him big money soon and theres no way you can say right now that you would be comfortable giving him that money. You just can't let this opportunity pass with that uncertainty.

But you have to bring in a new coaching staff as well.

[–] jhicks79@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] LookAtCarlMan@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

This is a hit piece on Bears fandom.

[–] CEOKendallRoy@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Talk to anyone who isn’t a bears fan and I guarantee they would say that building around fields is the right move regardless if you believe in him right now or not. Build an amazing supporting cast, how do we not know this? Our only Super Bowl winning QB was not a superstar. Build the foundation. We will have better short and long term success

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›