this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Das_Deutscher_1939@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Why not work with bagnet he may have been a bit iffy but getsy would do better with a pocket passer than a scrambler. I see potential in bagnet than fields if im being honest. At least with bagnet we scored touchdowns not these field goal miracles

[–] SnokeRenVader@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I’m confused here by all the people who want to move on from Fields. The request was that we see Fields take a step forward in his passing ability this year which hes obviously done.

But now people want to draft a new QB and hope he becomes what we want Fields to be?? Sounds like the same old dumb hole we always jump into. “The next guy is the answer!”

[–] -_-Moss-_-_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We cannot pass on Caleb Williams for mediocrity

[–] FaithfulBarnabas@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We don’t have the coaching or roster for a drafted QB to succeed. Maybe Caleb is better, you won’t see it here. He will fail here. Use this amazing draft capital to greatly strengthen roster, fire coach and get a great one. Then once Bears have good roster and coach start thinking about drafting a QB

[–] Rustiest_Nail@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I've gone from fields is horrible to hes great to hes horrible. Truth is hes somewhere in between. Not consistent enough to be great but talented enough to not be horrible. We can blame getsy for calling too many screens and lateral throws but truth is he knows fields better than anyone. Each screen tells you what getsy thinks. My take on getsy is that he is competent, far from great. But he tailored a game plan with bagent that had more vertical throw, because he knew hes more capable of reading defense.

End of the day fields is somewhere in the 15-22 range of qbs in the nfl which frankly just isn't good enough. If you can get a second from Atlanta take it and run. Had the bears not had a top pick from Carolina there's a debate in keeping him. But it's time to move on.

[–] JonSnowL2@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

He’s a gimmick QB. He can’t read defenses, but he’s a good rusher. I don’t want my QB rushing though, because he’s going to get freaking hurt all the time, and we have one of the best WR/TE combos in the nfl. Need someone throwing them the ball.

[–] Mach68IntheHouse@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The first step in building around JF involves sacking Matty Flush.

[–] dangshnizzle@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago
[–] adameaaa@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

JF1 has as much raw talent as any QB in the league. Give him better play calling and he will succeed

[–] Schweedaddy@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Realistically is there anything Justin Fields could do to prove to you guys that he sucks?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] THEE_HAMMER_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

You’re goddamn right we are. We are also, currently, in a great spot to continue to do so.

MHHJr and an Olineman in the draft. Keep the course.

[–] brafish@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The Bears will be better off if they CAN build around Fields. I’m still in that camp, but there’s still a chance he nose-dives the rest of the season and the Bears decide they can’t.

Honestly, none of it matters if the same staff is here.

[–] nevergotgold@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I'm convinced at this point that Fields agent pays people to support him in this subreddit.

[–] gRatajsbu@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Tough read as always

[–] UtterlyBanished@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

As soon as my time machine is working, I am forcing them to draft CJ Stroud, who they should be building around.

[–] Azmo_D@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Wrong. Bears defense wins their games. Try to change at your own peril.

[–] Nervous-Awareness482@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Let me just drop a grenade in this sub and leave. Byeeeee

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›