this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Justice Juan Merchan signaled in September that he would consider pushing back the trial date from March, which could potentially overlap with his federal trial in the D.C. election subversion case, but he ultimately rejected that and ordered both sides to meet in court a month before that after Trump's lawyers tried to take a peek at his private conversation with U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, reported The Daily Beast.

“No further disclosure is required,” Merchan wrote in a Nov. 9 order.

Merchan also argued that Trump had so many legal problems that he might as well keep the original trial date rather than complicate matters further.

“Indeed, adjourning this trial prematurely can only serve to further muddy your client's already crowded trial calendar and possibly result in even further delay,” Merchan wrote.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Somebody's tired of his BS.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

raises hand

[–] don@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

raises hand

[–] blazera@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump absolutely slammed by facing standard scheduling procedure. Truly he's feeling the retribution for his actions.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

He's gonna spend 2024 in court rooms rather than campaigning. But that might be his way of saving venue fees.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

so basically