this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Science

12226 readers
209 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And if so, how much? Less, same or more than if it was actually charging something?

I'm in the EU if that changes something.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Depends on the charger but either effectively zero or considerably less.

People get pissy about it, but think of electricity like water. Having a longer pipe is a negligible amount of water if the faucet is still off. And the faucet can only turn on if your device completes the circuit by being plugged in (and doing the appropriate handshakes)

That said, some chargers will consume a negligible amount of electricity to actively listen for a device. Think of it like the water in your toilet. Every so often enough evaporates or leaks that you hear it run a bit to refill. But mostly it is nothing until you flush.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Here's an article on it, in case you wanted to know how to go about verifying it for yourself.

[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

As an electrician I approve this analogy

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The water analogy is perfectly fine for many situations, but the reason these don't draw a lot of power when nothing is plugged in isn't because a "valve is off". There's a transformer, so this is like two separate water lines. If the charger is plugged in, there's always a closed circuit on the mains side of the transformer, even if there's an open circuit on the DC side. See the first diagram here: https://circuitdigest.com/electronic-circuits/ac-to-dc-converter-circuit-diagram.

The reason new chargers don't use as much power with no device attached is because of better design. If you checked an old charger or some crappy power supply, they'll use a fair bit of power even with nothing on the DC side. It's not enough that one would matter, but it is enough that there was an industry wide initiative to reduce phantom load resulting in new chargers that use almost nothing when nothing is on the DC.

[–] Knuschberkeks@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago

They do consume a tiny little bit. I have a Measurement thingy that yoj plug between your outlet and whatever is plugged in which is accurate to 0.1 W. I tryed 3 chargers, one shows 0.1 W, the other two show 0.0 . I still know they consume a tiny bit, but less than 0.1 W is almost nothing. 0.1 W would come out to a consumtion of 0.876 kWh over a year, wich costs me 0.30 €.

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A good rule of thumb is that the energy needs to go somewhere. So if the adapter was drawing a significant amount of power, it would get warm to the touch.

[–] stevestevesteve@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That's true - And with a halfway decent thermal camera, you can see most of these unused chargers as "hot" spots. They're so low power that they're only slightly above ambient, but still something the cameras can see.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

That's how I found out that my desktop speakers consume power even with the physical button being off and status light dark. The power brick stays warm indefinitely, a good 20W feels like! I have to unplug that thing now when not in use. Any normal power brick will be <1W of course.

[–] randombullet@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago

My office when everything is off consumes 7w total.

That's 2 high end computers, 3 monitors in sleep mode, 2 phone chargers a laptop charger.

7w is more than tolerable for me

[–] jana@leminal.space 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standby_power

You can always get a Kill-a-watt (or similar if those aren't available for the EU) to see how much power something uses in standby

I remember there being special power strips you could get to detect and stop phantom loads like this. But according to that article, there are now regulations to keep this power draw low, so it's probably not a major problem with modern devices.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

i have a couple of those power strips at the office. i'm always forgetting about that 'feature' and end up with stuff 'mysteriously' shutting-off or draining battery instead of charging.