this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
156 points (98.1% liked)

politics

25290 readers
2888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. George Santos describes his launch to Congress as attention befitting an "it girl," a phrase typically reserved for a popular socialite who rubs elbows with the most famous people.

But the adjective most commonly used before the New York Republican's name is "embattled."

Santos started his first term mired in scandal, admitting much of his personal and professional resume was fabricated. The lies ranged from being a volleyball star at a college he never attended to alleged fraud for which he is facing 23 federal charges.

After nearly a year full of revelations, accusations and challenges, Santos said he expects his first term to be his last after a recent House Ethics Committee report said the freshman representative violated criminal laws.

"You want to expel me? I'll wear it like a badge of honor. I'll be the sixth expelled member of Congress," Santos said Friday morning during an X Spaces, formerly Twitter Spaces, hosted by Monica Matthews.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (4 children)

How do people with no accountability get so far?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition ... There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” --Frank Wilhoit"

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The laws punish only the lawful

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

They only punish the innocent?

[–] drmeanfeel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Feature not a bug

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

This is by design. Really it is.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

"it's done when I say it's done, and by that I mean when they throw me out kicking and screaming."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Huh, it's so weird that he's a Republican. Did I say weird? I guess I meant to say entirely expected.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But the adjective most commonly used before the New York Republican's name is "embattled."

That it's not "fundamentally dishonest" or just "usually lying" shows how useless billionaire-owned media is at holding the rich and powerful accountable.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Calling him dishonest doesn't distinguish him from typical Republicans, though.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

True, but the "fundamentally" part implies an inability or unwillingness to EVER be honest that sets him apart from even your typical Republican as more of a liar. Such a thing shouldn't even be possible but here we are 🤷

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Santos is not rich, at least not with his own money, and he's the least powerful member of Congress, so really, not that powerful

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Santos is not rich, at least not with his own money

But has enough access, opportunistic tendencies and dishonesty to be rich on other people's money

the least powerful member of Congress

Still comes with a lot of power and privileges, especially when you're part of the club that's good friends with all the Federalist Society judges..

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

If you are to be expelled, it’s very much not over when you say it’s over. It’s over when your coworkers toss you out on your ass.

If he truly wanted control he would resign but he’s just lying as usual

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Shitbird with no integrity continues to have no integrity.

Film at 11.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

trolling the entire country and we just let him do it

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not we. Conservatives and Republicans, including the people in his district.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

The Republicans from his district were among the first people trying to throw him out. It was McCarthy who was protecting him because he needed the vote. Then Johnson did the same thing until the ethics report.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago

The platonic idea of a republican