this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
260 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

73602 readers
3120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec 135 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Firefox is calling all of you.

We just added a “copy link without trackers” context menu option too ;)

[–] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Big cocks at Firefox doing the lord's work once again

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So that's what people mean when they say Firefox works with BSD

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Big Sexy Dicks, yes.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

BILLY MAZE HERE WITH A HOT NEW BROWSER PRODUCT

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

CALL NOW AND YOU CAN GET AN OFFER TO RECEIVE A SECOND NEW BROWSER, FOR ONLY 12.99!

"12.99?"

THAT'S RIGHT, 12.99. BE ONE OF THE FIRST 200 CUSTOMERS TO CALL AND WE'LL THROW IN A WEEK'S WORTH OF BROWSING CACHE FOR FREE!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Well at this period of time one of the interns will have removed Firefox's user agent from the whitelist most Google services by mistake again.

If so, I just hope antitrust lawsuits will be fast enough so that it doesn't build up a bad reputation for Firefox ...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 108 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ad Blockers will limit Chrome usage starting June 2024.

[–] yimo@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The long awaited Firefox domination of the market !

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 25 points 2 years ago

Right in time for the year of Linux on the desktop!

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Users will limit Google Chrome starting June 2024.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I already did.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

I've been limiting Google Chrome for about 5 years now.

[–] DeskP1loti@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

what a bunch of cunts

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Oh ffs. FINE! I will switch away from Chrome!

[–] ARk@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Congratulations, you are being tailored a "personal experience"! Please do not resist.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Not surprising since Google is an ad company. I

Meanwhile I have been using Firefox on my various computers for a few years now.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh no! There are literally zero other options but to use Chrome!

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I know you are being sarcastic, but it's not sarcasm at all, and therefore no laughing matter, when more and more websites drop support for none-chromium browsers, or actively block them. Netizens tend to have some missguided belief that every problem can be solved with software alone. This is a trap.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What about Brave their whole sales pitch is ad blocking?

[–] pmarcilus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Wish them a farewell

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

This impacts all Chromium based browsers. Unless support is maintained separately by browser vendor, only other option is Firefox or any of its forks.

This is kind of a time for Mozilla to shine, but I worry they will mess up and maybe even follow later.

[–] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I limited google chrome a long time ago when i switched back to firefox for good

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Firefox's decision to move to WebExtensions is starting to look even more questionable, IMO.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It was originally questionable because it completely hobbled extensions, and now Chrome is seeking to hobble the standard even more

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah and it'll be very interesting as to what the Firefox fanboys will think then when that continues gaining traction.

I'll go back to what I said - all browsers are generally shit in one way or another. And they influence one and another. Very few browsers keep up the fight but browser hopping will be entirely meaningless when these people are out to redesign the web in their visage.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You can consider me a Firefox fanboy if you like - I certainly prefer it to the alternatives. Firefox made a bad decision to follow Chrome, and then Chrome made it event worse, so I don't think the fanboys will be moved from their support when the alternatives are worse.

[–] Species8472@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On mobile I'm using DDG as primary browser. Firefox as secondary.

On my personal machine it's Firefox and Chromium.

For my job I use Thorium as main (switched coming from Brave), Chrome, Firefox and Edge.

Could do without Chrome any day.

[–] PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

On mobile I'm using DDG as primary browser.

Don't get me wrong, DDG's app is a massive step up in privacy, but it's hardly a browser, it's simply a WebView frontend. You're pretty much still using Chrome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A year later, Google is restarting the phase-out schedule, and while it has changed some things, Chrome will eventually be home to inferior filtering extensions.

Google's blog post says the plan to kill Manifest V2, the current format for Chrome extensions, is back on starting June 2024.

The company says: "We expect it will take at least a month to observe and stabilize the changes in pre-stable before expanding the rollout to stable channel Chrome, where it will also gradually roll out over time.

On the high end now for me, Slack is drinking 500MB, while a single Google Chat tab, created by this company that is so concerned about performance, is at 1.5GB of memory usage.

Google is adding a completely arbitrary limit on how many "rules" content filtering add-ons can include, which are needed to keep up with the nearly infinite ad-serving sites that are out there (by the way, Ars Technica subscriptions give you an ad-free reading experience and make a great holiday gift!).

Mozilla's blog post on the subject promises "Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like uBlock Origin and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."


The original article contains 714 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I know Firefox is the popular option here, but do we have any serious non-google managed Chromium based browser options out there that don't have some weird gimmick?

[–] threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 2 years ago

+1 for Vivaldi. If you remember old, Presto-era Opera you'll feel right at home with it. I know there are some people who moved from Firefox to it, too.

Only thing is, their integrated adblocker doesn't support cosmetic filtering right now, but it's in the works.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Brave leads chrome-based browsers in terms of privacy and security, as long as you don't mind its endless controversies.

[–] ComradeBunnie@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm only using Chrome for work because the profile switching & syncing is so much smoother and our company is split into two primary brands - my brain handles it better with an individual browser profile for each.

We're consolidating everything into one next year, meaning I can ditch the second browser!

I've tried setting up a second profile but it was just too much effort to get it working and bring everything across from both, then do the same on my laptop for travel, so I'll just wait for now.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 2 points 2 years ago

Multi account containers. Check it out.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

I really don't understand why Mozilla doesn't add a profile switch icon in Firefox.

Most people probably have no idea that Firefox can do profiles or some of the stuff it can do with them (sync online, send tabs between devices etc.)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 2 years ago
[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's okay. Literally the only thing I use chrome for is gmail.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Try Thunderbird (desktop) and/or FairEmail (mobile).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Chrome has some special method / offline client built-in to access Gmail? Do not know anyone who just does not use Gmail web client https://gmail.com

[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

of seeings patturn

load more comments
view more: next ›