Fight For Privacy

295 readers

3 users here now

Fight For Privacy

A community to post, discuss and fight for our privacy.

Post Title Rule

Tag what the post is:

[DISCUSSION]
[CH], [etc.], : Article (tag the country, if not country specific use [ARTICLE])
[SEARCHING]: Searching for people/activists
[GUIDE]: Guide or how to
[UPDATE]: Moderator update for community

Post examples

[EU] - Title of the link/post
[DISCUSSION] - Privacy ...
[SEARCHING] - Referendum ...

Language: English

Rules

Keep the topic on privacy
Be respectful and tolerant
When posting link use tools like CleanURL to get rid of trackers
When posting numbers or statements, you need to link the source
Promotion of products/brands are forbidden
Politics not regarding privacy is forbidden, keep it on laws/decisions that concern privacy
If possible post Invidious links instead of YouTube

!fightforprivacy@feddit.ch

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Encryption@feddit.ch

[US] - Biden's NSA nominee defends collecting data on foreigners and Americans alike (www.reuters.com)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Encryption@feddit.ch to c/fightforprivacy@feddit.ch

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Lieutenant General Timothy D. Haugh is very clear on section 702:

"In my experience it is absolutely essential," he told lawmakers.

New York Times on Section 702: https://www.nytimes.com/article/warrantless-surveillance-section-702.html

A very "good" designed power point of section 702 by the US government: https://www.dni.gov/files/icotr/Section702-Basics-Infographic.pdf

The law text and section 702 (page 4), I had to search way too long to get to that, mostly you just find an overview by a three letter agency to justify the section. It is like the government does not want that you read it in full: https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ261/PLAW-110publ261.pdf

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here