this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
501 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

17774 readers
1697 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that's why you let educators decide which textbooks they deem fit for their subjects, not partisan regulators with an agenda.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ex-fucking-actly!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not like the cause of trillions of dollars in future damage and wars and famines and recessions is an important topic to learn about

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Nothing jesus can't fix

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Not a problem for the ruling class.

They'll see it as an opportunity.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Maybe Texas should, you know, transition to selling wind energy so their economy doesn't crash when fossil fuels are finished.

I read Texas's biggest imports and exports are oil. So the only thing bigger than their oil economy is their resistance to change.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

So here's the thing. When they say "Texas" in the royal sense like all of Texas is trying to will something, what they actually mean is the people and institutions capable of affecting change in Texas. Essentially the government and it's various arms.

Due to the fact that lobbying is very real and backroom payments are allowed to be a thing, the government inevitably bends to the entities with the most money. Guess who those entities are.

So when you say

Maybe Texas should, you know, transition to selling wind energy so their economy doesn't crash

what you're saying is

Maybe all those people who make their obscene riches in oil should give up their golden goose and let other people make their money in alternative energy forms

There's no reality where they go for that. "Texas" is always going to fight tooth and nail to keep alternate forms of energy down, because the biggest money in Texas is oil. The people have no control over that.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

You've worded this much more eloquently than I could have hoped to. Thank you 🙂

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But don't you see? They've discovered the most dirty and destructive ways possible to extract the lowest quality fossil fuel remnants in the world for just long enough that all the top executives will probably be dead or retired by the time it runs out! In other words, no problem!

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You'd think so, but with the amount of angry shouting and paranoid delusions of these ignoramuses, I'm not convinced..

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Good point. Ugly reality…

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wish this was what was really said

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's the actual quote from the show.

And it's spot-on.

[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

that makes me so happy

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ever wonder why Kennedy was killed in Texas?

[–] 69420@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Oswald was aiming for the books in the repository but missed.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Would you reject a science textbook if it had too much information about ionic bonding?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 2 years ago

Depends how much the Ionic Bonding Lobby Group was paying me.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

everybody knows the licentious covalent bonding is where it's at~

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nope. Then again, I'm not a fundie loon 🤷

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 years ago

Climate town recently did a video on this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pNRuafoyZ4