this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2494 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

75430 readers
1561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Once upon a time, Google wanted to kill the user-agent.

[–] corey389@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I feel like Reddit is doing the same shit.

[–] Xeknos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I can confirm this. I signed up for the free trial of YT Premium (which I immediately cancelled, but I'll take the three months) but YT seems to be detecting that I'm on Firefox and have Ublock installed, so I'm getting the occasional 5 second forced delay, even though I'm a premium user. (They may not count the trial as being a "true" premium user, I'd suspect.)

[–] ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If this is true the crowd on here that often says Firefox is really owned by Google because Google pays Mozilla to have their search engine be the default search engine on Firefox really need to look at their claim and rethink their understanding of how Mozilla and Google interact.

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not trying to defend Chrome here as I dislike their other behaviours, but just from what's presented in the video, an alternative explanation would be caching. That is, when the reloading is triggered by the switch of user-agent, the cache is reused and thus a shorter load time.

To exclude this effect, the user needs to either

  1. Spoof the user-agent and at the same time clear cache (you can disable cache when reloading through the developer's tool), or
  2. Clear cache, spoof the user-agent to Chrome. Load page, disable the spoofing, reload.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›