this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
702 points (99.9% liked)

196

18150 readers
1406 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml 194 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It is useful to have lots of stupid laws. It makes people feel powerless and frustrated. It means the police can always find excuses to persecute you.

The technicalities of the individual laws are not important. It's the psychological effect of the whole body of laws on a people.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The US does the same thing. People need to push back. Hard.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cam_i_am@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
  • me, complaining about the Acceptable Use Policy I had to sign at work.
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Given the context, this seems more evil than is probably intended.

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide. Water falling from the sky is the source of aquifers, lakes, and rivers that are important for everyone.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago

The problem here is that the Palestine people aren’t being given control of their water.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 years ago

Yeah there are good reasons to limit or prevent rainwater collection in order to preserve necessary river systems or agricultural areas etc.

However I highly highly doubt anything good faith is going on here.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 22 points 2 years ago

The context is very straightfoward. It is an occupied territory. The occupier claims ownership of natural ressources in the occupied territory. This is typical imperialist behaviour and illegal under international law.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

The evil part is having laws like this and then filling in their water sources with concrete.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To add what others said (like Israel making up rules for Palestine), the people of Palestine are being attacked and their infrastructure targeted. It is pretty evil to destroy the water supply and then say: "but you can't get it elsewhere :)".
I don't think this is necessarily the case here, but laws like this are often an attempt to offer the appearance of legitimacy to acts of violence (i.e. "yes we imprisoned them but they broke the law!").

[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago

and who better to claim ownership over the rain falling on palastinian soil than the israeli government

i dont think you can justify this stuff, at best make it sound slightly less evil

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Water for agricultural and domnestic use usually is fed back to the water cycle, though.

Watering my veggies is distinct from e.g. building a dam, or something.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could, though, for example, set up a large collection system for water that would normally be fed into a tributary that other farmers are using downstream for irrigation. A company with enough resources to collect and bottle rainwater for profit across a large area that would otherwise feed into aquifers could bleed a small farming community dry.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call that "domnestic or agricultural" use anymore.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, it's just that not all rainwater collection is inherently domestic or agricultural, and that's why some places (ostensibly, at least) have laws restricting it, with the goal being to keep it feeding into the water cycle and not shipping it elsewhere.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Read the highlighted text in the post again, please.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I didn't miss that part, I'm just saying that usually that's not why laws like this are created. The stated intent of this one is likely something about protecting fragile aquifers and the real intent is gradual genocide.

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

AFAIK, there is no such laws in Europe. I know for parts of USA and Israel. Correct me if I am wrong.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No such laws in Russia. And it seems no such laws in Poland. No for Ukraine, no for Belarus, Kazahstan even has some bonuses if you collect rainwater, Latviya has some bonuses too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide.

I never seen them before. Too much rainwater is a problem, but not collecting it.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

It's illegal for me to have rain barrels off my gutters. I wanted them to use the water for my garden. I'm not in any area with existing water shortage or drought issues either.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It can be actually. People upstream of water sources - often wealthy people with land but sometimes a collective of local farmers - build dams or retaining ponds to save the water for themselves and on a significant scale can limit the amount of water that goes downstream.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Oh I think it’s meant to be just as evil as it looks.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It makes more sense to limit the amount of water collected than to outright banning it tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't even... how do you prevent that?

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 2 years ago

Guns and bombs usually do the trick

[–] Leyla@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What's the usual way of stopping someone from collecting rain water?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Fines/violence, usually.

It's actually not uncommon to have laws that restrict gathering rain water in many places. Lots of US states do as well. If water is collected locally on a mass scale, it messes with water tables/rivers/lakes/etc.

Forbidding it when a place doesnt have otherwise dependable water infastructure is inhuman however.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I imagine the ban on rainwater collection is from before the war, and I imagine there are similar laws in Israel.

There’s lots to be mad at the Israelis for doing. We don’t need to make things up. This article on water in Gaza makes a good point:

A graphic representation of the unfair restrictions is that while many Jewish settlements have swimming pools, Palestinians in “Area C” of the West Bank are not allowed cisterns for collecting rainwater.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

it messes with water tables

Everything messes with them. EVERYTHING. Mostly wells.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Killing them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Rain is the property…”

Wow.

[–] Raine_Wolf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Ye, Israel do be taking the Nestle stance.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The United States does the same thing all over the Southwest. Rural people will tell you.

[–] SpunkyMcGoo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

isn't the point there that shit is super dry and if you leech the water in the wrong places the ground can't handle it?

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's illegal in some states as well.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I remember learning about this while having This Old House playing in the background.

Here's a map of the regulations for each state (currently the heaviest looks like it is restricted by volume and/or medium of collection) https://www.energy.gov/femp/rainwater-harvesting-regulations-map

[–] 8000mark@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Hamas has banned the digging of wells since 2021. I don't see how they would permit the harvesting of rainwater, even if there weren't Israeli legal regulations in place (which seem to be on par with many other countries' laws). That plus their systematic dismantling of working water infrastructure for rocket parts has had it's effects.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but they banned it as a bad way to deal with a water shortage problem. Israel banned it because they are pricks.

Many rural areas with Palestinians, including Palestinian citizens of Israel, aren't even covered by the Iron Dome system because they are registered as an empty area. They also don't get basic infrastructure that Israel would otherwise provide to any illegal settlement right away.

That would make Hamas even dumber as bombing Israel would mean a large number of unintercepted missiles will fall into areas where Palestinians live.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

But hamas collect the water and then make bombs to attack for no specific reason.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Water bombs. They launch kegs full of water to bankrupt Israel water companies.

[–] Leyla@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Should have added /s at the end. [Differentiating intentions is really hard these days]

[–] igorgama@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

What is water? H2O. What does the H stand for? Hydrogen. Ever heard of hydrogen bombs?

Still think Hamas (which is all Palestinians, UN officials, and doctors in hospitals, obviously) just want water do "drink" and "not die of dehydration"?

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Great source! Phrased differently - can't build a cistern without a permit - but they are certainly painted as right a-holes about it. Thanks for the source!

[–] SVcross@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›