this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

World News

49099 readers
1388 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now why would Elon Musk, self-proclaimed Free Speech Absolutist, have that account suspended?

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Good question. Maybe the same reason why Elon "humour is now legal again" Musk can't take a little teasing?

[–] jibbist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The data is public, the feed just only prints out publicly available flight data - if Elon wants privacy, he should just charter a private jet used by other billionare dickheads, it's not exactly a hardship now is it

[–] bighi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For platforms with an amount of users in many millions, we need regulations on who can be banned, and for what reasons you can't.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, not sure why the Guardian is reporting on this. I'm not even sure Threads is available in Britain.

[–] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It's The Guardian, they were probably paid to advertise for Threads

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

This is why competition in the online space is essential and we need strong regulation to kill the network effects that keep Twitter and reddit afloat.

A platform should not be able to unilaterally censor anyone.

[–] AquilaChill@fedia.io 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There is a difference between keeping tabs on someone & stalking/harassment.
I don't like the Elon jet tracker stuff, I'm more a fan of privacy.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's not stalking though, if he wanted privacy he could fly on a normal commercial plane like everyone else.

[–] Tosti@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The account only republishes publicly available data. The worlds flight data is publicly available (Google search: flight tracker).

So there has never been, is or will be an expectation of privacy.

Elon making a case to the contrary is just wrong. But he has the loudest bullhorn so he gets support from people on his asinine stance.

If he wanted privacy, he should not have aimed to become one of the most public influencers in order to cash in on his fame.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except flight data has no expectations of privacy.

Your airplane is legally required to broadcast its location in the USA. For safety reasons. Everyone with a private jet has that private jet constantly broadcasting its location.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

https://lemmy.world/u/hoodatninja@kbin.social

All your public comments have been replicated here thanks to Fediverse.

I presume you know about this, right? That's how this place works. Every server in the federation is copying, saving, and holding onto your posts. It'd be insane to be worried about this. Seriously.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I know what you're trying to say. But your analogy is pretty crap, so I'm not going to cede you the point.

Find a better analogy.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I know what you said because plenty of other people have made that crappy argument to me already. And like many others, they have come up across a brick wall of reality.

The long story short is: don't put your faith in Mr. Musk's arguments. If Mr. Musk new how reality worked, he wouldn't have been court-ordered to buy Twitter last year. His arguments may be echo'd across the internet, but they're astonishingly bad.

There's literally nothing illegal with the Elon FlightJet tracker. The only thing Musk has is control of Twitter, but the dude can just switch to Facebook, Mastodon and Threads and still keep publishing the flight information cause there's literally nothing illegal about it.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

There’s literally nothing illegal with the Elon FlightJet tracker.

I literally never said there was

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›