this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63381 readers
657 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 3 points 2 years ago

This is why sites and services like Archive.org, MyAbandonWare and Myrient are absolutely vital, and why IP owners generally suck balls.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Emulation is a moral imperative.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most classic video games are on my computer, so this study was wrong.

[–] hansl@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The study acknowledges that piracy is a way to play, but it isn’t legal. Basically we need an equivalent of the Library of Congress for video games, which is a reasonable request and conclusion. There is no way to play without ripping your own cartridges, and even that is still legally gray. See https://youtu.be/yj9Gk84jRiE

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/yj9Gk84jRiE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] ThatGirlKylie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Still have a bag of old snes and n64 carts in my closet along with at least 1-2 snes and n64 consoles from my childhood.

I would go to garage sales with my mom as a kid every weekend and I still do sometimes looking for clueless people throwing out old consoles.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

I still have all my old N64 carts too. Worried that the internal batteries are dead and my childhood saves long gone.

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

eh, just pirate the game. if it's not available anywhere then it probably wasn't worth having in the first place.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

NCAA Football 14 fans making angry noises.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

I agree with your first statement, but not the second one.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They’re video games, who gives a shit. Most things are lost over time.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So why should the Library of Congress exist? Why should the Internet Archive exist?

"They're books, who gives a shit. Most things are lost over time." "They're web pages, who gives a shit. Most things are lost over time."

There's value in record-keeping. People can analyze it on a technical perspective (like a literary analysis). People can enjoy old games (like reading a book from the 1500s). People can analyze trends in the industry. There are endless reasons why record-keeping could be useful, and you can never plan for all of them ahead of time.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh yes, let’s worry about saving the intellectual capitol of paper boy, frogger, etc. It’s meaningless bs that’s why it doesn’t matter.

[–] evdo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

There are far more valuable stories than those being told in video games.

Even those examples have value. Knowing their history can do wonders for future gameplay design.

So if we have the means to archive them, why not do it?

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well I'm sorry you can't fathom that there is potential future value in old games. I even said that we can't know the future value of something like this, so the safest thing to do is to just preserve them as well as we can.

Do you disagree with all of the explicit examples of ways it can be valuable that I laid out? Or do you simply want to assert the games are "meaningless" and ignore every way in which value can still be derived, or could be derived in the future, from them?

I suspect you haven't actually thought this through and are just being antagonistic for fun; that's how it comes off, anyway.