Linux

48072 readers

1 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

117

Anyone else starting to favor Flatpak over native packages? (lemmy.one)

submitted 2 years ago by DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one to c/linux@lemmy.ml

216 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am currently using Linux Mint (after a long stint of using MX Linux) after learning it handles Nvidia graphics cards flawlessly, which I am grateful for. Whatever grief I have given Ubuntu in the past, I take it back because when they make something work, it is solid.

Anyways, like most distros these days, Flatpaks show up alongside native packages in the package manager / app store. I used to have a bias towards getting the natively packed version, but these days, I am choosing Flatpaks, precisely because I know they will be the latest version.

This includes Blender, Cura, Prusaslicer, and just now QBittorrent. I know this is probably dumb, but I choose the version based on which has the nicer icon.

(page 4) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Sailor_jets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I use Gentoo so when I want to try a package that has a butt ton of dependencies or other fun things I give it a whirl via flatpak if available. It's super nice, not gonna lie, and I see the use case of immutable distros. I think they are neat.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] The_Zen_Cow_Says_Mu 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

recently rebased from fedora to debian, and reinstalling apps through flathub was ridiculously easy because all the settings and data were preserved in /home. also flatpaks incorporate newer mesa than what comes with debian stable, so it's an easy way to stick with a stable distro but also be up-to-date in userspace.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] aadil@merv.news 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My experience with Flatpaks has been so stable and hassle-free that it motivated me to switch to Fedora Silverblue.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Hell yes! Feeling futuristic.

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unless they come up with something else that is not "Windowsfying" Linux with one-click installs... then nah, no thanks.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, it seems like all this convergence of convenience is muddying the linux waters... then again it has never been that clean.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like them for convenience, I don't like them for customability, possibly just because I don't know enough about them.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

That is a good point I have not encountered too often. I don't tend to customize the programs I use. I tend to just learn the defaults for that program.

Anyways, people keep recommending FlatSeal, which is a graphical way to customize Flatpak permissions, so that may be helpful to you.

load more comments