Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
About this site...
© 2006 Josh Kaufman. Content last updated: May 21, 2006
I mean, this is still all true, but damn. Why is boingboing reporting on a nearly 20-year-old site in response to news about the diamond industry? One could argue the existence of that site and people's knowledge of all that being true is part of why diamond sales were in the crapper anyway...
boingboing has really gone downhill since most of the original team left and it became an ad-infested mess.
While I agree we shouldn't be using them for jewelry, diamonds are factually very important and incredibly valuable to manufacturing.
They're the only thing hard enough to cut and shape tungsten carbide, which is instrumental in basically any complex machinery work.
the ones in tools are man made and they're a lot cheaper to buy
Depends on the tooling you're going for. Synthetic diamonds are great for creating abrasives, which makes up the majority of industrial diamond tools.
But for a lot of machining where you need a large cutting head, industrial diamonds are a little too small. I think most synthetic diamonds are less than a millimeter in diameter. They can be made larger, but they take a long time and aren't very cost effective.
The vast majority of diamonds mined are industrial grade, especially the larger ones. So you end up using a bit of both depending on your application.
Interestingly, moissanite (per the source referenced by the article) exceed diamonds in hardness ("toughness") as well.
I saw that as well, but I think cut hardness must be jewelers terminology. As far as actual hardness diamonds are a 10 on the mohs scale, moissanite is a 9.25, and tungsten carbide is usually around 9-9.5.
Interestingly, the pic used is a diamond discovered in Crater of Diamonds State Park in Murfreesboro, AR. It's a unique 83 acre kimberlite site where you can pay a small fee, and take the kids to search for a diamond that, if you find one, you get to keep. I lived 42 years in Arkansas, and we took our kids and had a fun time digging and teaching the kids about geology.
I say all that to make the point there are good sides to understanding diamonds without the BS surrounding shitty business practices and human exploitation. That park is a decent step in the right direction.
https://www.arkansasstateparks.com/parks/crater-diamonds-state-park
The stupidest part is synthetic diamonds are just as good for anyone but the most discerning of jewelers, but people still don't want them.
Because natural diamonds are made artificially scarce, that is why they are so expensive.
While synthetic are not.
People want expensive things, not diamonds per se.
Not that stupid when you realize a lot of people see them as status symbols and don't want people to think it's "fake" even if its better or rather perfect. Sucks but ig people really like bloodied shiny rocks over anything else if it makes them look rich.
I've been getting podcast ads lately for "natural diamonds" which is badmouthing man made diamonds and a it give a couple very true facts about how 80% of the diamond's value stays in the community and it's all legal and above board and definitely no one dies for these diamonds.
Wait, wait! Lemme guess. "Exploitation of child labor, unsafe (ie. lethal) practices, and general corruption", right?
Yeah but also cut hardness shine fire brilliance etc etc. moissonite is objectively superior in every way.
This site is about two very simple truths: (1) diamonds are an incredible rip-off, and (2) a little known naturally-occuring gemstone called moissanite is superior to diamonds in every essential way: cut, color, clarity, durability, fire, brilliance, and cost.
When I proposed to my wife, I gave her the choice. Sure could have a diamond, or she could have a moissonite (which is sparklier) and we could pay off her car loan. She made the right choice.
She married someone richer? 😂
Shit. Where'd I put my burn cream...
The engagement ring I gave to my wife had natural diamonds, but it belonged to my great-grandmother, so I felt it was ethical enough. I certainly wouldn't have bought a new one that wasn't synthetic.
Re-use beats new every time
You forgot about the whole, hoard heaps and pretend they're rare and we don't have swimming pools worth in warehouses.
All my homies hate diamonds.
I've heard that diamonds brought to the surface from the depths below change with time cos they don't experience the pressure anymore.
I heard that you won't be able to tell the difference because you're not a jeweler.
Personally, I think it's good people value 'natural' diamonds more so they can get ripped off by being sold synthetic diamonds and told they're natural.
They won't be able to tell the difference, and they have enough money to fund their stupidity.
I have a feeling that you're implying negative critique on me.
Just telling what I heard, mate. I don't know is it a fact or not. I don't use or buy diamonds and I don't know much about them.
Cheating people is not cool.
One thing you could do would be to get the diamond checked to find out its authenticity.
Cheating rich idiots is definitely cool.
They only got rich by cheating others, so it's all fair.
They only got rich by cheating others, so it’s all fair.
While that may be the case in many situations, I doubt it is in every existing case.
Or they inherited it from someone who took advantage of others, correct.
I guess you can make an argument for restitution.
I love BoingBoing. It has shown me some interesting news articles from all around the internet.