this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
52 points (93.3% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I took me far too long in the article too realize that it was not about trying to intentionally roll the car over.

[–] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ye, is "flip your low-VIN [car]" technical jargon or was I supposed to understand it?

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To flip something, in this context, means to sell it.

And a VIN is a Vehicle Identification Number. It’s essentially the serial number of the car, with a lower number indicating an earlier production time.

So in short, Tesla will sue people who are trying to resell their early production model cybertrucks.

[–] ModsAreCopsACAB@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which is completely ridiculous btw. People can do whatever the fuck they want with their own property. Tesla can eat a monkey brain chip.

If it’s a long-term lease, like Honda did with their Insight hydrogen fuel cell cars, you could actually make an agreement something like this. But if it’s an outright purchase, Tesla trying to outright restrict resales is possibly illegal.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How would that even work? If someone owns the vehicle how do they tell that person what they can or can not do with it?

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Braces for the downvotes.

Teslas are SaaS on wheels. Most EVs are sadly.