this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
640 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

83929 readers
2694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (6 children)

which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

Uhhh... how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

[–] Quexotic 7 points 23 hours ago

Jumper cables.

Makes me wonder how the jumper cables guy is doing.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 21 hours ago

Hahaha I said the same thing

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That bit confused me as well. I'm thinking in case the launch and deployment failed, they could get it back much more easily

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This thing launched 50 years ago, it and it's sister probe are farther from earth than anything else by multiple orders of magnitude, they're literally outside the sun's influence. We obviously aren't getting them back so recovery must mean recovery to an operational state

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 7 points 21 hours ago

Thanks for the uplifting news!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When is the next conjunction of planets that enabled the Voyager missions happening and are we preparing for it?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Voyager mission launched in 1977. If I recall correctly, it takes roughly 80 years for the planets to realign for that purpose. If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

1977....

Roughly 80 years

If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

A bit more than halfway, although sometimes I am shocked by how long ago 1977 was. Wasn't it just, like, 30 years ago or so?

It can't possibly be 49 years ago, can it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

The clock ran out years ago. They have been building bridges to New clocks for decades. But yes. Soon it will die, only propelled forward into nothingness and loneliness forever.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Only delusion separates us from the same

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

would be great to have some solar that would power a beacon or something if it ever entered another star system.

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Radiation and cold would have killed any electronics long before it would get to another system. And with the electronics dead, nothing would be able to tell the beacon to activate.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Is there radiation between stars? I'm sure it's cold tho.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Plenty. Unfortunately it's mostly the nasty damaging kind, rather than the sort that can be turned into power. It also doesn't take much damage to add up, when you're dealing with large millennia time scales.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

it would destroy them so when heated and energized they would not work?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait does solar power work with other suns? Or just our sun (Sol)? Or just yellow dwarf suns?

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dawg you can shine a lightbulb at a solar panel and it'll generate electricity. Them shits don't care, a photon's a photon

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 12 points 23 hours ago

Yes and no. Photons is photons, but solar panels do have varying efficiency by light wavelengths, called spectral response.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Are solar panels like superman?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

as @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works said. it should depend a bit on how its made. there have been things about making panels that would absorb frequencies we have at night. There are trade offs. I was under the impression that the reason plants are green is because they specialize on the red side which is more prevalent and then the blue because its the most energetic or something. Also I was under the impression most stars look basically white but the color thing is based on spectrums that predominate but like when you look at the sun it looks white and even a red star would look mostly whitish.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›