It's quite a feat of engineering to have something run this long - and without having physical access to it.
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
640 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
83929 readers
2694 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Only 49 years!
Enshitificashion.
Doesn't even run Outlook, let alone two. Pathetic.
This is so fuking cool
I am filled with pride that we collectively made something that will likely out live our sun, and we continue to find ingenious ways to keep it going and going
What a cool time to be alive
I remember when both Voyagers were making their fly bys. We'd get a bunch of images in magazines and stuff, and then wait several more years for the next planet. Between that and the Space Shuttle flights it was awesome.
I wasn't around for the moon landings so Skylab and Voyager were the highlights of my days.
Here are Images Voyager Took.
I have no idea how to sort them by recency; I'm guessing it's not sending such expensive data anymore, but what are the most recent (and furthest) images?
Why can't we be as forward thinking as the people who created the voyager probes?
Voyager 1 was launched in 1977 - just before the Reagan era. Coincidence?
Also, and I'm still just guessing here, it's probably the culmination of the space race to the moon minus the pressure to be there before the Russians.
In other words, NASA's Golden Age.
Also, the tech was "just right" then. Small and frugal enough to fit on a probe but still robust enough to survive more than a few years in space.
There is no way that disparity is that close.
Now please show an inflation adjusted graph or better one that shows in percentage how much each fraction owns of the wealth pie.
Jesus that is a sobering figure I did not need to see today.
And it’s quite outdated, I think from 2022. It has become much worse since
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's not profitable
not enough engineers use LSD anymore because they'll lose their entire career over it and be blacklisted from government contracts forever.
the McCarthys won.
What a badass little craft to have kept operating for so long. 🫡
Check out AMSAT-OSCAR 7 -- Closer to home, but launched in 1974, and still waking up when there's sun to operate. It's the oldest "operational" satellite still up there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMSAT-OSCAR_7
AMSAT = Amateur Satellite! Holy shit. Amateur, my ass.
It’s a satellite for amateur radio, it’s not implying it’s an amateur satellite.
Oh.
Cool that the Polish opposition used it to get around wire tapping.
load more comments
(1 replies)
A truly beautiful piece of engineering
NASA's Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It's the same autism across an ocean of resources.
Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.
RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.
For roughly three milliseconds I thought to myself they shoulda used solar panels instead.
"Oh, wait...."
Well they could power a lamp that shines on the solar panels.
This photo was taken after Voyager was launched, NASA didn’t have the technology yet
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It is amazing they can detect and communicate to something with such a weak signal so far away.
I was actually looking into this a little bit recently and it turns out the Voyager spacecraft launched with 23 watt radio transmitters but at the distance it takes a 72 meter dish to capture the signal and at its capture it is one attowatt. I don't remember my system right offhand, but it's something like a billionth of a billionth of a watt. It's stupidly small.
So far away that it takes an entire day to get the signal to it. The earth to the sun is 8 minutes.
And somehow we can still talk to it. It's amazing.
About 1/3 of a % of a lightyear that's hardcore that we've gotten something out that far.
It also gives you an idea of how big space is. Lots and lots of nothing.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›