this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
45 points (85.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47732 readers
719 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also why did he choose to be a doctor of all jobs?

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, the red robes and glowing orb do have a certain appeal.

[–] yellerbadger@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I don't think it necessarily follows that omnipotence necessitates lack of emotion.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Omnipotence implies the ability to control emotions (along with everything else). Were God only framed as being omniscient, then your answer could explain it. It's a bit harder to ignore the gap for omnipotence.

OP's question is a version of the classic Omnipotence Paradox: "Can God make a rock so heavy he can't lift it?", which has had a good couple of thousand years worth of discussion, but no particularly satisfying answers. I doubt lemmy will have a breakthrough, but no harm in trying.

[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Controlling your emotions simply means that you do not immediately react the way your emotions would take you, and that instead you act appropriately to the situation. It doesn't mean that you don't have emotions, or that those emotions cannotir should not influence your resolve towards the line of action you decide to take.

I also don't see how it is related to the rock question (or my favorite alternate, could God microwave a burrito so hot that he himself cannot eat it). There is not a paradox between being powerful and having emotions.

Just for fun, as a stab at the paradox: yes, God can limit his own power or prevent himself from doing stuff because he said he would. Like for example in the Christian religion Jesus came as a human and that severely limited himself. At one point he really wanted to not die but couldn't do anything about it because that was the path he set for himself and he can't lie. Same principle applies even if Christianity isn't "the one".

I think where people tend to get tripped up with this paradox is that things cannot be simultaneously true. God could make the sky totally purple, but he didn't, so we're here with the sky being totally blue during the day. He could make it half purple and half blue, but didn't do that either. That's not proof of a lack of power. He could make the rock too heavy, and then he could make the rock not too heavy later, kr himself stronger. This doesn't disprove anything about theoretical omnipotence. And lastly, presumably things are explained to us in a way we understand. Perhaps God does have some sort of hard limits to power, but as far as we are concerned it may as well be infinite. There's not much of a point in semantics. The very question betrays our human way of seeing things, God probably does not usually have a body to lift things. Does levitating it "count"? Does moving the earth down count? Does asking someone or something else to do it count? It's an interesting question that has persisted for a long time, I just don't think it ultimately means much once you break it down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

God can't be described in the terms of man so they give him human like traits to try and understand him. That would be my logical take if I believed in magical sky daddies.

[–] muse@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Because many people would rather believe that someone is in charge of natural disasters and suffering. Some take it further as a pretense for convincing their peers to remove competitors for resources.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Religion is a primitive means of governance. Check out the Books of Laws in the Old Testament. This is literal civil code for the time lightly veiled as something mystical.

The problem is, the bigger a population becomes, the less wieldy religion becomes as a means of governance. It’s why cults work but the state of Iran (as one example) is rife with dissension and horrible enforcement laws. Too many people for stable governance via religion. Factions, insurgents, defectors will abound.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -1 points 23 hours ago

If god is Jewish what did he use to circumcise himself?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›