this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
1194 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11332 readers
1973 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember, kids: don't try this at home!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fiona@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve said that on Reddit and people got mad at me.

A single warehouse burning because of low wages is like a single healthcare CEO getting shot: Funny to read about, but ultimately not going to change much.

Turn it into a monthly thing, and it becomes a revolutionary act that will change things!

[–] sober_monk@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I've said that on Reddit and ~~people~~ bots got mad at me.

FTFY.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 28 points 1 day ago

Remember, kids: don't try this at home!

Yeah! Try it at a factory

[–] bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 144 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's like the best way to prevent police brutality and murder: simply make them individually liable for damages and require them to carry insurance for it. Bad actions make you uninsurable, and the rest of your department more risky (expensive).

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Ironically the reason we have this problem is because the armed guards of capital are one of the only jobs that still have strong unions.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 32 points 1 day ago

Union is underselling their mafia racket.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 108 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unions were the compromise between violence against the capital from the working class.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Every few generations everyone seems to forget the existing social contracts exist for reason, and that reason is never the benevolence of the plutocrats.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too bad companies spent decades demoting and crushing them. Paid money for it, even.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The same Pinkertons that were hired over a century ago to bust unions, are still around today for a reason.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually it's only a warehouse if it comes from the warehouse region of France. Anything else is just a "storage shed"

[–] Stitch0815@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

sparkling storage shed

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

you'd be replaced with robots even sooner

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago

I it seriously got to that point those robots would have to be fireproof.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Beacon@fedia.io 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More like "Old school problems require old school solutions"

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wooden shoes are so uncomfortable though

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

Toss em in something with gears to make them more comfortable.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not a modern problem. Not a modern solution. Fuck Dave Chappelle.

That's right, kids: try it at work!

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago

Hypothetically, I really hope this happens. Hypothetically, like once a week for the next year.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 13 points 1 day ago

I'm not a lawyer, but this sounds perfectly feasible to me. So insurance companies simply choose to not treat low wages as a risk factor. I wonder why 🤔

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally, a sensible market solution /s

[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Right. A more likely one is that having staff in a building at all are a liability and so all these warehouses are moving to robots. There will be an oversaturation of warehouse workers vs sites still using them, and so these fires are just going to bring wages lower.

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

If they used to be houses, then they are were-houses.

If it used to be a house, then it's a was-house.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 16 points 1 day ago

Usually what the owner class does is push for tougher laws instead

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

So they run without insurance, lobby to mitigate their liability and the conditions of workplaces plummets.

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The ESG that the right deserves

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 day ago

Oh no how unfortunate.

Burn baby burn. Disco inferno! Burn baby burn!

load more comments
view more: next ›