this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
309 points (98.4% liked)

Canada

10227 readers
362 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report released Thursday says that privatization of health care in Ontario won't reduce wait times but may actually increase them.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 54 points 2 years ago (5 children)

The only people who believe that wait times would be worse under a public health care system are people who don't currently need to access health care under a private health care system. I'm an American who unfortunately needs to see specialists relatively frequently and the wait times are already atrocious.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

It’s worse than you think

It’s government funded private care and at least in Ontario there isn’t any oversight or accountability allowed for private centres

[–] settinmoon@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

See here the problem is when any kind of healthcare conversation starts in Canada the US always gets brought up as a sledgehammer to shutdown any further discussion. I live in the US and nobody thinks the US system is the solution for anything. But there are dozens of working examples in Europe and Asia that are worth learning from. Canadians need to look beyond this continent.

Well, if you were a billionaire with private doctors and access to preferred care then you would be way better off than someone in Canada, ergo the American system is better.

That's the only performance based argument in favor of privatized care that I can think of.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm in Quebec, it's 12 to 18 months to see a specialist...

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wildly varies based on your specific health profile, and above all, what kind of specialist.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

And the perceived urgency of your medical issue.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 years ago

The fuck out of here with private healthcare

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Private health care opens -> Private offices offer better hours and/or better pay -> Doctors and nurses jump ship because everyone has bills to pay -> Pubic offices get even farther behind.

Canada should be un-private-ing EVERY part of healthcare, not just the paying part. OHIP style where the govt. sets prices and pays for care but hospitals and doctors offices have to make enough to keep their lights on AND provide health care (and line pockets because private) is just stupid.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Plus private only offers better until public goes to shit, then private does whatever the fuck they want, which is prioritize the wealthy who will pay the most. Profits!

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

See : USA

The only people who think that private health care in the USA is better than public in Canada are people who have never had to deal with private insurance. It is expensive, wait times are still long, you get nickled and dimed for every little thing to inflate the bill, CoPays, Out-of-Network, your primary care physician/hospital/ambulance/anesthesiologist might not take your insurance.

It is an unlit maze of bullshit and the insurance company does not care if you get lost forever.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd love it if they did that to telecoms too, everything is so expensive. cost of living is quickly outweighing the benefits.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The benefits ... of living?

That's pretty dire.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm an American expat, and lemme tell you, I wouldn't care if it did shorten wait times. Fund the doctors whatever you gotta to keep it all public and free. Also, add dentists thanks.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Also, add dentists thanks.

The NDP are trying.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

Obviously, if our tax dollars are going to private care that costs more then there is less funding for the cheaper public system and less over all to spread out

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But it will make more money for our corporate overlords and their priesthood of investors.

This isn't about health care or taking care of people .... it's always about the religion of money.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago
[–] ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As an American who has waited a full workday in an emergency room for the privilege to then get a mystery bill that seems to be the product of a random number generator, don't privatize your healthcare.

[–] settinmoon@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

To me the entire article seems to be establishment propaganda that tries to convince people that the current system is working fine and we just need to dump more money in it, which is not a real solution as we don't have infinite money. Keep in mind a reform doesn't mean we automatically turns into the US overnight. It might not even include any private component at all. But any reform that cuts waste will impact the various interest groups benefiting from the waste and inefficiencies in the current system and that seems to be what is article is defending against.