There's no need for congress to pass this. The constitution already requires it. But of course the courts are captured so they won't enforce it.
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
489 points (99.4% liked)
politics
29444 readers
1754 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Fetterman hasn’t been a Democrat in quite a while now.
What party is he a member of?
Well he was elected as a Democrat and then suffered brain damage and started voting as a Republican. So DINO.
Sorry, when did he switch parties again? Think I missed it.
There's always at least one.
... and THIS is how Ds show their compliance when the minority.
... and THIS is how Rs show their compliance when the minority.
BoTh PaRtIeS can stop this "supermajority" nonsense at ANY TIME. But, from their point of view, that makes popular legislation too easy to pass, and they don't want that, do they?
Instead, they ¯\(ツ)/¯
If memory serves this "supermajority filibuster" circus started in the 1970s. This is a parliamentary rule ONLY. It's not law. It's not in the constitution. It requires only a simple majority vote to erase. They pass legislation they really want without it all of the time, by making it an "exception" to the parliamentary rule (also done through simple majority vote). There are hundreds of "exceptions" to the super majority rule. This is what they want to pass.
So, this is a fucking circus that they can stop at any time. For example, Democrats could have decided "enough is enough" when Biden was in office after the monstrosity that was Trump, and used the "nuclear option" (that's what they call it) to revert to simple majority vote to pass laws. Then, they could have passed lots of very popular legislation, a new New Deal, so to speak; 70% of American voters want universal healthcare, for example... 90% of Democrats want this.
What did the Democrats do for their own voters?
¯\(ツ)/¯
Couldn't even pass higher minimum wage.
that Keystoner will ne’er be a better man
I don't understand this dude...he's all over the place....in otherwords...Loose cannon....nope!