this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
583 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

15587 readers
1241 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.

Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz
seahorse@midwest.social
graphito@sopuli.xyz
583
Behold: A vibe-designed pcb (infosec.pub)
submitted 4 days ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the people who trained neural networks on stuff before ChatGPT and uploaded YouTube videos with titles like, "I FORCED an AI to read ALL of twilight, and THIS is what it wrote!" and then they laugh at the garbage that comes out of the model. Like... yeah, the model is not good at this task that it was not designed to do. Some of the text is funny, but in the same way people don't really emotionally respond to AI art because there was no human intent behind it, I don't respond to AI "humour". It's using a tool wrong and then laughing that the outcome is bad.

There's satirical comedy to be had here, but it needs to be grounded in what actual people are doing. Personally I haven't seen anyone seriously expect a language model to be able to assemble a functioning PCB, so I can't enjoy this as satire either.

Or could it be genuine curiosity, just seeing what happens? Always possible but such a predictable outcome doesn't tickle my curiosity either.

So, there are all the reasons I didn't find this interesting. Why did I reply it all? I dunno man.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the people who trained neural networks on stuff before ChatGPT

I did this with Buzzfeed clickbait headlines, not using neural networks, just simple Markov chains.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah sounds about right! And that's true a lot of it was with Markov models. I think some was NNs though.

[–] Quexotic 2 points 3 days ago

AI is, in the end, designed to subjugate us further. It's intention and utilization is innately corrupt. That said, it's important to understand how it works. This is badly enough done that it reflects more on the user than the tool.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

First thing I noticed is the type c port is backwards

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is kind of a neat novelty thing I guess but I would have made sure it was functional before printing it

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

the point isn't functionality of the board, it's more ai functionality. it's clearly an idiot

[–] randomname@lemmy.org 3 points 4 days ago

Push AI button, don’t check, complain about AI, problem is human

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Nothing a little bodge-wiring and a Pi compute-module can't fix.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

C2 also looks useless. Itnlooks like the trace goes in and out on the same side.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago

All three IC pins are shorted too lol

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah the ai assumed that the other side of c2 was negative/ground trace and not insulation

[–] username_1@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (17 children)

The guy is an idiot. I can understand trying to use LLM to make an electronic scheme, but sending the result to manufacturer without checking is a symptom of imbecility.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I'd argue this has incredible artistic value. And I think that was the point.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 4 days ago

Hell, both Gemini and Claude have done well for me in throwing some code together for simple apps, but I still looked it over before running it. I try to do that for even human-made open source code, although at least in principle, if it's been up a while, others have at least tried it and given feedback.

I'm sure this is just a joke or a proof of the issue; you'd have to look at the PDF or whatever it gives and see that something is way off.

And for the record, the best code that I've gotten from an LLM has been the first few runs of an idea, one that was thoroughly explained in the prompt. If you put together a vague prompt and continue to add to it, it will get worse quickly, with the LLM even changing parts that were perfectly fine. Maybe turning the temperature down, if possible, will help with that randomness, but it's always better to keep sessions short and precise.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Am I missing it? Or is there not even an LED to light up?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Wow, he's using those new invisible inductors!

Live stream plugging it in to your computer, whoever you are. And then in to your phone and then your router.

[–] domusaltera@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

(Switches is it on) Boom, time machine!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›