this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
487 points (99.0% liked)

News

37211 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth, and that’s one of the things that I try to do, and it’s certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant,” he added.

The pope and Donald Trump have exchanged barbs over the past several days, with the pope denouncing the war in Iran and Trump responding by saying Leo was “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 106 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Quite a Protestant think to say, for a supposed Catholic.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (2 children)

MAGA is JD’s religion now.

JD's religion is and anyways has been whatever is most politically expedient at the moment. Dude is a snake in the grass when no actual morals or convictions.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Mammon are these people's religion. Or Ba'al, depending on perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 75 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Excuse me, but did Juliette Dianne Vance just challenge the Pope on theology?

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

CUT MY LIFE INTO PIECES

THIS IS MY LAST RESORT

Maybe we need a youtube documentary from somebody exploring the emo to fascist pipeline...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago

Thats Vance!? Hahahahahahahaha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

They're really going with 'lets pick a moral fight with the Pope'.

... I actually have trouble comprehending this, because it is so obviously a politically stupid thing to do.

JD is apparently considerably more lost in the sauce than I thought, has od'd on his own fart sniffing.

It really is wild how immesenly hubristic this all is, but it does serve as a very useful illustration to the rest of the world to drive home the idea that American Christians (TM) quite literally think they speak with the authority of God himself, which is broadly regarded as insane heresy by most other Christians in most of the world.

They're idiot fascists to the core, and its like 30% of the country that is this way.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"they're very low IQ." "Stupid" "losers" all of these weak insults, and they never, ever give examples of such. "How so are they losers?" "What makes you say they're stupid?" There's never any push back. These are the things a bully says because they're insecure and don't know why. There's no evidence or thought given to these insults.

How is the Pope weak on crime? Show me when the Pope said Iran should have nukes. This is the most basic push back. The media just lets him say whatever without questioning it.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Fascists don't use language the way normal people do.

They don't believe in 'truth' or 'reality' as most people understand it.

They believe that things just are the way they say they are, because they said so.

They primarily use rhetoric, and pathos.

Logos, logic, actually being correct or truthful... they only employ these things to the extent that they can aid either a rhetorical or emotional appeal.

Their entire strategy is 'create a collective delusion / cult that appeals to the weak and gullible'.

Trying to evaluate the things they say, logically, is generally a waste of time.

The proper way to converse with a fascist is by breaking their jaw with a baseball bat, to disarm them of their weaponized nonsense projection machines.

Fascists believe language is a weapon, not a means of having a discussion.

Their real language is violence, so you must commincate with them in their native tongue, to succesfully convey any 'meaning' to them.

[–] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

If you can read this you are a pope. Specticals, testicles, wallet, and watch. Ramen.

[–] Bo7a@piefed.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My pope card is the first piece of ID I provide when asked by LEO. It hasn't worked well. Yet!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Well obviously you need to give it to someone other than pope Leo, he's the person least likely to accept it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible, especially in the domain of theology & religion, then why is Vance saying any of this? Sure seems like his “Catholicism” is name alone or perhaps his faith is more Protestant than he wants to admit. Or, he has values above his faith, and for a Catholic, that seems worse.

Whatever, Jan.

Edit: I’m ex-Catholic. I don’t need a theology lesson about the specifics. What the Pope is expressing here is within the domain of church doctrine.

Stop trying to defend fascists with pedantic details.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Pope should just excommunicate the couchfucker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Not justifying mr couch fucker, but I will point out: modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible when speaking "ex cathedra", literally "from the chair", which is also like... weird with different peoples' opinions on what is ex cathedra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

on the other hand, Vance's "catholicism" doesn't even match the fucking Bible, so, yknow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 12 points 4 days ago

He can disagree with the pope but not disagree with the catechism and still consider himself catholic, and the pope is only restating the "Safeguarding Peace" chapter.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (5 children)

modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth

Oh dear, somebody has a lot of catching up to do. Start with Council of Nicea and go from there.

FUN FACT: Council of Nicea was formed to settle the age old debate of "should priests cut off their balls or not? On the one hand, Jesus said to do so... on the other hand, my balls."

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I think time and experience has proved Jesus right - priests should definitely cut off their bollocks.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Think of all the leaders who told the Pope to fuck off in history. Nothing but great successes. Surely we're winning.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

Henry VIII didn’t do so badly for himself.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The pope needs to excommunicate JD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

JD bout to start MAGA Catholicism and install himself as the pope.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A antipope you say? That hasn't happened in a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

JD’s political career is over after this regime

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Take him into a backroom with promises of a soft couch.

Then just fucking shoot him in the head. Lights out. No fanfare. Just gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is this Onion? Why shouldn’t pope talk about theology? I thought it is like his area of expertise?

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 3 days ago

It is literally his job description to do so.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They think he fights crime

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How can he call himself a catholic while disrespecting his own religious leader

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Because his real faith is money

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 22 points 4 days ago

JD Vance lying about his truthfulness and integrity, both of which are non-existent.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 4 days ago (8 children)

"You shall know them by their fruits." - Jesus Christ

Neither Trump nor Vance are Christians.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis? [...] I certainly think the answer is yes."

So, if you assume God did not like fascists in the 1940s - what makes you think he has changed his mind to now support you and your ilk, couch boy? That's a mighty big plank to pull from that eye of yours.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Every member of this administration, past, present, and future, need to be held accountable when this is over. If we don't do that, then the Constitution, our laws, will continue to erode when the next batch of grifters show up to push the envelope to see how far they can bend and break the rules.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

My take on this is that the Night of the Long Knives has clearly started in Trump's inner circle and Vance (sent to no-win scenarios in Hungary and Pakistan while Trump and Rubio were bro-bonding without him) is starting to feel on thin ice.

So he's trying to demonstrate how far backwards he can bend over to justify anything Trump decides to crap on Truth Social.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated France from the Nazis? Was God on the side of the Americans who liberated Holocaust camps and liberated those, those innocent people, you know, those who had survived the Holocaust?

What a silly question. It's silly because it's based on the idea that God is a being who would pick sides in the first place. It is generally commonly thought by believers that we are all God's children. When your children get in a fight do you pick sides and cheer for one of them to kick the other's ass? I would hope not. I would hope that, as a parent, you would step in and try and stop the fight.

Assuming there is a God, I would hope he/she/it would just be terribly disappointed in all the children involved for not finding a way to settle their differences peacefully.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s silly because it’s based on the idea that God is a being who would pick sides in the first place.

If you read the Bible, you'll find that God picked sides immediately, and has never stopped. He even has a "Chosen People", you can't possibly pick sides any further.

We may all be God's children, but remember, God is perfectly fine with murdering billions of His children, and not only that, He tortures them with Hell forever after. He can't even let them die in peace.

Yes, it is certainly silly, which makes it all the more horrifying

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 14 points 4 days ago

There's really not enough people getting punched in the face these days.

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Are they trying to make an American Orthodox Church or something like that?

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Pentagon already threatened it mafia-style.

“In January, behind closed doors at the Pentagon, Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby summoned Cardinal Christophe Pierre — Pope Leo XIV’s then-ambassador to the United States — and delivered a lecture,” said Hale.

“America has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world,” Colby and his associates informed the cardinal. “The Catholic Church had better take its side.”

As the room temperature grew, Hale said he confirmed that one U.S. official “reached for a fourteenth-century weapon and invoked the Avignon Papacy, the period when the French Crown used military force to bend the bishop of Rome to its will.”

During the period in question, there were two Popes. One in the Vatican, and one in Avignon. I'm fairly certain that if the Vatican doesn't bend to Trump's will, there will soon be a Church of America with it's own Pope.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I'm curious on what the MAGA boyz think of this sionist.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

vance would know, he reaped the last pope.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware the Pope was a law enforcement official, or a foreign policy official. Gosh, where would we be without these little gems Trump keeps dropping?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

As absolute monarch, he is in fact both of these thkngs.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

Satire is dead

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 4 days ago

imagine one of these perpetual liars saying the pope is a liar.

I know it's a long shot but I desperately hope some of them live to regret this behavior.

load more comments
view more: next ›