this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
435 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29444 readers
1754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I believe the state should never have financed them in the first place, it was a crime,” Magyar continued. “Mixing party financing with government spending from the state budget is, in my view, a criminal offense, and this will have to be investigated by the future authorities, including the National Office for the Recovery and Protection of Public Assets, since those budgetary funds were not meant to finance party events.”

“CPAC is welcome to come to Budapest, very welcome, but it should not be financed with Hungarian taxpayers’ money,” Magyar added, saying that Orbán and his party were free to fund it themselves if they wanted.

Several U.S. political commentators remarked on this revelation that Orbán’s government had been funding CPAC, including Reason reporter Billy Binion, who pointed out that meant that other American influencers and organizations may very well have been getting paid by the Hungarian government too, “which may explain why so many were shilling for one of the most corrupt politicians living today.”

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EpicMuch@sh.itjust.works 119 points 5 days ago

Zero chance that VP Vance didn’t know that CPAC funding was coming from Hungary. Explains that trip of his exactly

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 68 points 5 days ago

Remember folks Super PAC were designed specifically so donations could be anonymous and untraceable so as to allow foreign interference and conservatives to could get the vapors when this fact is pointed out and shared

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 62 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How much should we bet that Russia isn't also funding CPAC?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Right now, probably not, not enough ready cash. A few years ago, almost certain.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Does…does this mean Hungary paid for newly Widowed Erika Kirk to take the stage flanked by fireworks with a giant smile on her face while she was supposedly grieving?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That was turning point, no?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Read the last paragraph.

Also, we already know that the likes of Benny "I'm totally not GAY!!!" Johnson were/are funded by Russians.

Do any of the followers of any of these "influencers" or movements ever bother to stop and ask themselves just WHY Russians would want to fund conservatives? I realize they don't have much introspection, but....

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

They like dictators.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago

Good call. When you dethrone one of these conservative bastards you have to follow up and finish them off or you seed your own downfall. Americans need to learn this.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

Yes, that image is real. Including the text on the banner at the top.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Stage upon which Musk delivered his sieg heils, believe at least one more of those creatures did it there too (thinking Bannon, not gonna bother to look, they're all irredeemable).

[Edit: correction of details below]

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Musk did the salutes at the inauguration. Which is so much worse imo

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You are more correct than me, looks like his were at a rally following inauguration ceremony. CPAC was indeed Bannon about a month later. I do agree, your correction makes it worse.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I cant wait to see what else gets uncovered, and if anything is done about it.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Well, we will have to wait until the grown ups in other countries release information. In the US, they’re still protecting kid fuckers.

[–] pfried@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And the US used taxpayer money to send Vance to Hungary to stump for Orbán there, right out in the open. In Hungary, using taxpayer money to fund an extremist foreign political party is a scandal. In the US, this matter is too deep in a flooded zone for anyone to care.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The fascists learned from the Communist International and emulating it. The mistake of the fascists in the past was the excessive tribalist mentality. The Axis never really coordinated but instead made alliances of convenience depending on the heat of the moment.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 6 points 4 days ago
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

That last paragraph. Like…yeah. We already know loads of top ones were on Russian payroll.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Couldn't Orban argue he was corrupting the US gov. in order to get their good favor ? Since the US has a legal way of doing it there was no reason to involve diplomats and intelligence services.