this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
525 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21253 readers
2315 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I've noticed over the years, that the british legislators seem to be overly obsessed about porn.

Obligatory Dan Bull: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTeENEQkBKE

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago

The moral police that funded and pushed the anti trans narrative weren't going to stop at being anti trans.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

What about NOT step family member fucking NOT step family member porn? 😉 😉

(EDIT: I make jokes about common porn tropes, but after reading the article, it sounds as though it's aimed specifically at step family porn has an underage/child role-playing element)

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

First they come for the step-bruvs, next the gardeners and pool guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand, do they mean they are ok if it is under 18 but not incest? Is that where they draw the line regarding underage porn?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

so now I can fight back against those limey bastards by responding with incest porn?

is this like the 1989 tiananmen square hack for the Chinese?

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 5 days ago

Inb4 the film Clueless is banned across the UK, lmfao

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck is going on with the UK?

Isn’t incest not even a crime?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because fictional scenarios of incest relations might as well be engaging in the real thing. If even the Epstein class says it then surely it must be true.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

fictional scenarios of incest relations

Not incest. Step relations are not blood relations. The parents marry and combine their existing families.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's the UK government, their digital crimes division is basically 2 men in a shed

This is basically a rule that will not get policed unless they wanna find an excuse to fuck over a dissident that they can't find any other excuse to put in prison

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›