this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
681 points (95.0% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

793 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] restingOface@quokk.au 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They would absolutely charge a "children fee" if they were legally able to.

[–] Nomad 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You all understand that the children fee is literally paying for enough space to house children? Do your cats have their own room? ;)

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My cats think that my rooms are their.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

No, you think the cat's room still belongs to you.

[–] Nomad 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but all of them. ;) no matter how much room you own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfrasin@lemmy.today 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Excuse me, but the bigger scam is the entire Landlord concept

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Social housing, which is “owned” by the community as a whole, is the answer. Not only for people who are not yet ready to own, but also for housing in general.

Vienna is a prime model for this, where social housing is frequently much cheaper than ever owning a home. Most families that start out in social housing cling to it their entire life because it is just so much more financially responsible.

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This sounds like someone that has never seen what cats can do to a property when the owner doesn't take care of them.

Piss drenched carpet and moldy walls are a pain in the ass to fix.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

You ever seen what half-arse parented kids will do? All of the above + holes and pest infestations

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I worked retail for many years and I consider children pests as well

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's how onr apartment of mine got flooded. Kid 2 floors up was playing with the plumbing

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I vaguely recall reading that such child fees would likely be illegal (in the US)? I think it might also be illegal to exclude families with children from being eligible to rent a given location. Don't quote me on either, though, because I don't have sources on hand.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 1 week ago

In Brazil is illegal for landlords or apartment buildings to charge or prohibit pets on their units. They are some laws around, like it should be as big as you can charge it on your arms, can't use the common areas unless designated pet areas and can't be loud at night.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's provincial here in Canada but I vaguely remember some building having a no child rule and then losing a court case when the strata tried to evict folks who ended up having kids.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would love to live in that utopia. No children allowed in an entire suburb would be heaven.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do people being outside really cause you that much of an issue? My neighborhood has tons of kids. They're just there existing. The closest thing to being bothered is just making sure I don't back in to anyone if they're playing. Which isn't that hard, nor does it add any issues to my day since you know I look behind me when I back up.

If you had said apartment complex or condominium I'd get it, but like in a suburb everyone has their own detached home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the US, many mobile home communities require tenants be over the age of 55.

I’ve seen weird rules too, like 50% of the household must be over 55. So like if your spouse is younger but you are older than that is okay. This pretty effectively does a good job of restricting children just based on math and family dynamic without explicitly stating “no kids”.

One of my parents used to live in such a community. It was quiet as hell at night.

So restrictions like that are clearly legal and not considered ageism. (I might have considered living in that same community if I were old enough.) But apparently restricting children would be illegal?

Fair housing act makes it illegal to deny housing or charge more based on having children.

Senior aged restricted housing is legal because seniors vote. The exception is a different law and explicitly makes it okay.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It's not legal to charge pet fees if it's for a service animal so it's probably related to that in some.

For services animals they cannot even enforce size or breed restrictions. I have in laws that used this to get a pit bull for their child with Down Syndrome. It wasn't a fee dodge, the apartment had a blanket no pet policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Children are members of society. They're imperfect, but still. As other members of society, we have a duty to at least tolerate them.

I find it very sad that some people treat them like a different species. You wouldn't hear people say, without being countered, "I don't want to see old people" or "I don't want to have to interact with women". It's fucked up, you don't choose the other members of society.

[–] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I do agree with you as a childfree person who doesn't like children. Most of the time I blame/hate their parents instead. Like the parents of the kids upstairs. One of them has a "band". For the past year he's been trying to learn 3 songs almost every day in the evening. It's incredibly annoying to listen to this musically untalented kid when I'm tying to relax. Put some goddamned headphones on him, for fuck's sake.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Have you ever met your upstairs neighbors? Talking to someone is the only way to let them know you want something. Maybe they aren't aware of how audible their kid is to other people in the apartment complex

Yes! They (or at least the SAHM) are rich assholes who could have bought a house, but instead chose to buy an apartment in a building so the breadwinner's job is 5 min away. They let the kid play with the windows open so the entire neighborhood can enjoy the sounds of the same 10 notes on repeat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Society rather wants people to have kids and not pets for self-preservation reasons

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

Encouraging renters to have kids is a rare long-term investment strategy by the landlord class

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All it takes is one untrained dog with separation anxiety to chew through walls and tear trim off of door frames to trigger rules like this.

Or one elderly pet with severe incontinence peeing in the closest carpeted corner instead of the litter box.

With that said, children certainly have a much greater capacity for damage, especially when they get older. Infants? Not so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I once toured an apartment that charged pet fees and for dogs REQUIRED A DNA TEST so they could fine you for not picking up poop.

Someone out there is dna testing literal dog shit.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No one is actually doing that, they're charging a fee to do nothing until someone complains enough that they'll send out a strongly worded letter hoping the person not picking up their dog poop will admit to it out of fear.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Wholeheartedly support, I wish my apartment complex did that. Dog poop all over the place.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I lived in a complex that required such samples from dogs. They still never did anything about all the shit lying around

[–] krathalan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Same here. lol

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Tough one. I've never wanted kids and my God are they so goddamn loud...

But, as more of my friends have kids I feel more and more for parents, it's damned tough to raise kids and finding housing, especially in my city is brutal.

Still, not like a fee helps anyone beyond the landlord.

[–] Entheogen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Last time I was charged a pet fee, I asked them "So if my wife gets pregnant, do we need to plan to pay extra on the rent?"

The leasing agent looked at me like I was crazy and said "Of course not, that would be ridiculous!"

And then she realized... Like I could literally see it flash across her face. She dropped it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago

don't spread this pro landlord bs

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Don't give them ideas

[–] HelloDingo@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My current complex does this, and while I rather doubt the authenticity of the service, I support the threat of it if for no other reason than to make some of the nasty bastards around here actually pick up after their pets for a change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago
[–] UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Change the appartment.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›