this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
960 points (98.8% liked)

memes

20947 readers
2826 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

The beacons are lit! The working class calls for aid!

[–] Quexotic 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How many warehouses is it now? 7?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is it really? I haven't seen it

[–] Quexotic 2 points 6 days ago

I'm not sure, honestly. Social media and news media seem to be telling different stories, unsurprisingly.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Walmart now?

Have there been more fire bombings?

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

No, this is the kimberly-clark fire, this is a reference to that older twitter meme.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 246 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Counter-offer: Make tents for the homeless out of landlord skins

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 146 points 1 week ago (28 children)

I posted this comment already yesterday but i'll post it again because it's still relevant:

Do we want to get higher wages? The obvious answer might seem “yes”. But i argue it’s not that obvious.

People should be able to live without being forced to work. When your only income is from wages, that effectively forces you to work. I think we should strive for a society where basic needs are fulfilled even without jobs.

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 45 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Personally i think that unless you're disabled everyone should work. Where I live everyone has basic healthcare, cheap schools and there are lots of unions and workers rights so literally no one has to work more than 32 hours for a basic level of living. If youre disabled you receive wellfare so you dont have to work. Its literally a choice if you live on the streets here.

I have literally no idea why the US has such a horrible and oppressive system when it comes to workers rights, healthcare and schooling. I don't understand why anyone thinks it's a good idea to have a two party system. I have no idea why the rich barely pay any taxes there. You have a truly corrupt and inhuman system in place.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's because we were a nation founded by violence and oppression and built on the backs of a slave race, none of which are practices we ever truly abandoned.

You have healthcare, affordable schooling, and labor unions because, wherever you are, your populace is considered a workforce, not a slave race. When your society relies on a workforce, you want them healthy so they can work longer, you want them educated so they can work smarter, and you want them comfortable enough with their salaries and their hours to feel they can afford to have kids, who will one day join the workforce.

Governing bodies in the US don't need us healthy, smart, or comfortable. They just need us to 1) work (hence tying our healthcare to our work hours), and 2) breed (hence minimal sex education, poor access to contraception, abortion bans, etc).

They don't need to give us healthcare (or education, or basic human necessities or rights), because as long as we're breeding, it's cheaper if we just die. And if that ever bothers us enough to take to the streets (which it has, many times), our local police forces are highly militarized and have no qualms about doing to us what their white ancestors did to my native and black ones (which they have, many times).

And to be clear, this isn't meant to be a woe-is-America spiel. These are problems that we've had many opportunities to address over the years, but let hubris, bigotry, and plain old stupidity get in the way. This is very much a mess of our own making, so I'm not trying to throw a pity party, just addressing your confusion.

TL;DR: Violence, oppression, and slavery. The tried and true American way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

The US specifically didn't choose a two party system. We accidentally set one up. The math proving that FPTP has a 100% guaranteed chance to devolve into a two party system hadn't been done until the mid 1800s

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Every take that excludes this perspective is ableist.

Just my two cents as a person who was born and will die disabled.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 100 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Except with insurance they probably made money. The trick is for it to happen often enough that insurance gets too expensive.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well insurance only pays out on the value the retailer bought their inventory for, not the sticker price. Yeah they're getting a lot of money but rebuilding inventory and a new warehouse is probably more money. And Insurance companies might start considering underpaid employees as an insurance liability.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And Insurance companies might start considering underpaid employees as an insurance liability.

That'd truly be righteous but I suspect they'll start expecting more surveillance, security, and fire systems instead.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which, although they don't improve conditions for the workers, are also expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They announced they're moving their entire operation out of CA, lmao.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They probably didn't make money. Insurance won't cover the retail value of unsold product, just the cost to make it. The building owner can get replacement cost for the building, but still loses out on rent.

The insurance company will raise rates to compensate for the payment, but it's probably enough to hurt them for a quarter too.

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it were profitable to burn down a warehouse, there’d be a whole industry around it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

The world needs to move towards socialism to respond to this moment, or fall into the grips of fascism.

How does capitalism inevitably lead to fascism?

Basically, the issue with capitalism is that the more wealth you have, the easier it is for you to make more money. And since money can be used to buy goods, services and influence, there is always a way to use money to gain more political and social power. With that political and social power, you can push society and the legal system in the direction you want to go. So you can use your wealth to gain power, and then you can use your power to change laws and society so that you can make even more wealth and power. It’s a positive feedback loop.

Obviously, though, if the billionaires and ruling class are accumulating more and more of our society’s wealth, that inevitably means that there’s less for everyone else to go around - therefore, working class people feel poorer and poorer. Meanwhile, the economy is going absolutely great for rich people, so inflation continues to go up - everything gets more expensive, but wages don’t increase. The wealthy just keep more and more of the wealth for themselves. To accumulate more and more wealth, they change the laws so that they can avoid paying taxes, so public services collapse. Politicians are lobbied to ensure that public funds are diverted away from where it is most needed - housing, healthcare, transportation, infrastructure - and instead into industries where their class interests most benefit from it, such as weapons manufacturing and extractive industries such as fossil fuels and mining.

The working class are bound to notice that their lives are getting shittier and shittier, and if that situation is left unchecked, the working class would realize that the ruling class are fucking them over, rise up, and overthrow their rulers. Obviously, the ruling class need to do something about this, but there’s no solution that the ruling class can offer. They’re causing all of the problems, to fix them they’d have to give up some of their wealth and power - and that’s not something they’re going to do. So they need to find someone else to blame the problems we have in society on. Unfortunately, though, no matter who they blame the problems on, and no matter what they do to “fix” it, the issue will continue to persist, because the material conditions underlying the issues are, very intentionally, never addressed.

So, the conundrum returns: The ruling class said that minority A caused all of the problems, minority A is persecuted and oppressed, but society doesn’t actually get any better. Either the problem wasn’t minority A, or minority A just hasn’t been oppressed enough yet. So the ruling class can either escalate the oppression, or they can shift the focus to another minority group. The division continues to escalate in terms of how vitriolic and extreme it is, and it also continues to divide the working class into smaller and smaller groups.

To get the working class to buy into this hateful message, they need to take advantage of our worst instincts, and one of those instincts is the in-group bias. The majority are manipulated into being suspicious, then intolerant, then hateful, then violent, then genocidal, towards whatever the targeted minority of the day is. Anything that can be used to divide the working class - sexuality, nationality, immigration status, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender identity, age, all of these will be used as wedges to keep the working class split apart and not working together, because they know that if the working class actually unite against them, they are completely and truly fucked.

That’s exactly how fascism manifests. It’s because it’s possible for people to accumulate power through wealth. This is why capitalism must be abolished. If we do not abolish capitalism, fascism will always return. It’s just a matter of time.

But can't capitalism can be reformed?

While, of course, some laws to reform capitalism can be passed, and would definitely alleviate the worst harm caused, over the long term, capitalism cannot be reformed.

Any attempts to reform, democratize or socialize capitalism may yield short term improvements to quality of life of the working class, but if capitalism is not abolished, it will always reassert itself, and capitalism inevitably leads towards fascism.

The New Deal prevented the US from sliding into fascism in the 20th century, so that’s ultimately a good thing, but it did not go far enough, and that’s why we have the resurgence of fascism in the 21st century America.

But the Soviet Union was really oppressive!

Yeah, the soviet union had a lot of problems, Stalin was a psycho. Let's not do that, but we can do socialism using a bottom-up, direct democratic, consensus based decision making approach, rather than a top-down, centralized state. We can learn from the mistakes of the past.

I'd encourage you to check out an anarchist FAQ to learn more - If you haven't heard much about anarchism before, you probably have some misconceptions about it, so I encourage you to watch the Q&Anarchy video series by Thought Slime or have a look through an Anarchist FAQ, because it's almost definitely nothing like what you think.

I personally believe that it's the most coherent philosophy which adequately explains and addresses all of the problems which plague our society, and which holds the most promise for a path out of the inevitable cycle of the continuous rise and fall of fascism that capitalism makes inevitable.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

The USSR was a dictatorship under a mask of communism and socialism. It was literally the opposite side of a coin, where mostly the top of a country had all the goods, while ordinary citizens were used as cheap working labor. Basically, the same thing what happens in the US, but with less freedom. It was never a true socialism/communism system in a first place.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was the fuck aroundest of times

It was the find outest of times

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is an absolutely hilarious way to hear about this news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orenj@leminal.space 33 points 1 week ago

Bonfire Lit

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

what walmart was firebombed?

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

None — it’s a Kimberly-Clark distribution warehouse. Their products include Kleenex, Cottonelle, Scott, Kotex, and Huggies

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've posted this in another area regarding this event, but I think it would be wise to post it here, too.

From Malcom X’s Ballot or the Bullet:

“Anytime you have to rely upon your enemy for a job, you’re in bad shape.”

“You can’t sing up on freedom, but you can swing up on some freedom. Cassius Clay can sing, but singing didn’t help him to become the heavyweight champion of the world. Swinging helped him become the heavyweight champion. But this government has failed us. The government itself has failed us. And the white liberals who have been posing as our friends have failed us. And once we see that all these other sources to which we’ve turned have failed, we stop turning to them and turn to ourselves.”

“He made a chump out of you. He made a fool out of you. He made you think you were going somewhere, and you end up going nowhere…”

“So today our people are disillusioned. They become disenchanted. They become dissatisfied. And in their frustrations, they want action.”

“You, today, are in the hands of a government of segregationists, racists, white supremacists…”

“America today finds herself in a unique situation. Historically, revolutions are bloody. Oh, yes, they are. They have never had a bloodless revolution, or a non-violent revolution. That don’t happen even in Hollywood. You don’t have a revolution in which you love your enemy, and you don’t have a revolution in which you are begging the system of exploitation to integrate you into it. Revolutions overturn systems. Revolutions destroy systems. A revolution is bloody.”

“So it’s the ballot or the bullet. Today our people can see that we’re faced with a government conspiracy. This government has failed us. The senators who are a filibustering concerning your and my rights, that’s the government. Don’t say it’s Southern senators. This is the government. This is a government filibuster. It’s not a segregationist filibuster, it’s a government filibuster. Any kind of activity that takes place on the floor of the Congress or the Senate, that’s the government. Any kind of dilly-dallying, that’s the government. Any kind of pussyfooting, that’s the government. Any kind of act that’s designed to delay or deprive you in need right now of getting full rights, that’s the government that’s responsible. And anytime you find the government involved in a conspiracy to violate the citizenship or the civil rights of a people, then you are wasting your time going to that government expecting redress. Instead, you have to take that government to the World Court and accuse it of genocide and all of the other crimes that it’s guilty of today.”

“It’ll be the ballot or it’ll be the bullet. It’ll be liberty or it’ll be death. And if you’re not ready to pay that price, don’t use the word freedom in your vocabulary.”

In this speech, he does say we Americans have a unique opportunity to do things non-violently. We did not get unions by being peaceful. We did not get labor rights by being nice.

I want a peaceful way. I truly do. But options are running out quickly. This is not an encouragement of terror or violence. I, like many other want other ways. But as we can see, we cannot control everyone. Some are in situations that feed the violent mind extra portions of greed’s injustice. This breeds a vengeful, hateful spirit that even the most noble and moral of humans cannot withstand.

If our world, country, and local leaders continue not to act swiftly and quickly, this will continue, not because you or I will act, spread hate, or encourage this, but because those who are starving for justice will act out. They don’t need to browse these halls of discussion to be radicalized. The ultra-rich and our dystopian nation will do that for them.

Choose wisely, work together, and eliminate injustice by any (hopefully peaceful) means necessary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 15 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's not like the CEO will have to pay for this...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›