this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
452 points (80.8% liked)

Comic Strips

23229 readers
2870 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

When I see this shit I want to read HP. Not because I like it, I hated the books, just out of spite.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Man, I have literally heard people say you should burn the books and movies you probably already owned long before Rowling was known to be a TERF. The art isn't the problem. As long as you're not continuing to financially support the bitch herself, Harry Potter himself ain't gonna harm trans people.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The art isn't the problem

Yeah, it's not like you have anything like

  • Two Indian characters named after the region they're supposed to be from
  • Stereotypically named Irish character obsessed with blowing stuff up and making alcohol
  • An Asian character named "cho chang"
  • Bankers that are barely disguised anti-Semitic tropes
  • Literally a tweet saying only “Anthony Goldstein, Ravenclaw, Jewish wizard.” in response to accusations of no Jewish wizards
  • Naming the black adult "Shacklebolt"
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Thet was likely overzealous religious folk. Because it had magic and witches it was deemed by them to be demonic. I'm quite sure they would be surprised to learn the author of the books they hated was an ally for one of their other beliefs.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

You want comfort British wizard comfort characters: read the Rivers of London series.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a plethora of artists to choose from that aren’t assholes. These folks keep talking about opening mind to other points of view. If that’s their stance then they can open mind to new options.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I mean yeah, so long as you're not actually giving money to the evil woman that wrote those books in any way, nobody's stopping you from enjoying your old Harry Potter books and DVDs.

Heck, if you're missing one you can buy it on eBay second hand, just so long as you're not supporting the evil woman with a shiny new purchase, ya know? That woman doesn't deserve a penny.

There's a separate conversation you might want to have with yourself on whether your can separate the author from the work while you're reading it, of course, and whether you're comfortable doing so or not is a personal decision you'll have to make for yourself.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 15 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

I read the books, but I was 14 and it was 2000. Haven't consumed any of it since.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I was 14 and it was 2000

Quite the age difference there.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 19 hours ago

I offer you the dad crown.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 11 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

But HP isn’t even good

The first movie was ok at best

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›