this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
439 points (81.1% liked)

Comic Strips

23229 readers
3291 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 58 minutes ago

OK, this is a tough one and what I'm about to say might get me some dislikes. Let me just say something that might soften the blow: Fuck Rowling, her transphobia, and the bigots that defend her wretched views. Even if she decided, in an alternative timeline, decided her loudmouth shut, she would still be the scum of the earth for her views on trans people. I repeat, Fuck Rowling.

Now, with that out the way, let's address the crux of the issue. I know that many of you in the LGBTQ+ community grew up with the franchise and enjoyed it long before Rowling exposed her true colors. If you're LGBTQ+ and you decide to reconcile, in some way, with the franchise without directly supporting Rowling, you're well within your rights to do so. The nostalgia you feel for something that brought you joy in your youth is yours to keep. No one, not even the creator themselves, can take that from you. As for the products themselves? You can: buy the books secondhand, pirate the movies, pirate the EPUBs if you have an e reader and buy fan-made merch from LGBTQ+-friendly sellers.

If decided to not reconcile with the franchise, you're also well within your rights to do so. Rowling has to made aware of the damage her views have on people. Demonstrate the hypocrisy of writing about a group of outsiders finding a place of acceptance and discovering their true selves and espousing bigoted rhetoric towards a discriminated group wanting acceptance for their true selves. There's plenty of other fictional universes you can draw your attention towards (more on that in a moment) that are far less problematic and worthier of your time.

If you're an ally (like myself), it's best that we don't engage with the franchise all together out of support. For me, this isn't a problem since I didn't engage with the franchise all that much in my youth (I was more of a LOTR fan). If you do decide to reconcile, much of what I have already said still applies.

In short, the question of reconciliation is a personal matter. So long as Rowling isn't benefiting, you should be happy with your decision and the stand you take. As for alternatives? Well...

The already mentioned Lord of The Rings

Dune series

Discworld

Elric of Melniboné

Wheel of Time

[–] h3ll3rsh4nks@ani.social 5 points 2 hours ago

The best way to enjoy something that may benefit a problematic person is to simply acquire it in a way that doesn't benefit them. Perhaps whilst on board a ship with a nice barrel of grog.

[–] Suffa@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 hour ago

Potheads are tiring.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I have never even had an inner monologue about wanting to support of continue consume the work of someone who made something I like after they've got outed for bad shit. It's just and instant "damn, sucks to loose that thing but that's all there is too it."
I seriously don't understand people who do that and the whole "separate the art from the artist" shit.
We have more than enough of literally everything, you aren't giving up something that nothing else can replace. There's more stuff to like and discover from nice people than anyone can fit in their lifetime.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

cuz art can be beautiful in it's own right.

And it's not fair to loose it just because the OP is shit.

Like futurism, my favourite artstyle? i just love how they show this world in motion and so Industrial (yes I study mech eng how did you guess), I support the painters? fuck no, fuck them, but their art is pretty regardless.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

I don't know, but as I grew older and the world became more harsh, out of cynicism I stopped investing in so much pop culture and especially personalities who have or could possibly make an about-face.

So many people in this thread defend J.K. Rowling, or at least the Harry Potter works, under the guise that Rowling's anti-trans positions are just an opinion. She does so much more than just talk. She uses her personal fortune made directly from Harry Potter to fund legal attacks on the rights of transgender people in the UK.

Imagine if Elon Musk showed up one day to fund a civil case against you for playing rec league soccer or to get you fired from your job. This is what the beginning of genocide looks like. It may take years to get to the camps and the ovens, but we will get there. Hell, the camps are already built here in the US, and they will house more than the transgender.

https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I think we should normalize acknowledging reality. JK Rowling is a POS, Neil Gaiman is a POS, many others are POS or problematic for different reasons. A lot of products are owned by problematic companies. Some have better alternatives.

Bashing people for it is just going to make people tune you out though. Just be aware. I'm really not interested in the Harry Potter show. But the movies are a staple. If I see Tom Cruise is in a movie I get a lot less interested in it. I still like Edge of Tomorrow though.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Bashing people

What usually happens is people conflate critique of the media they consume with an attack on them as people.

That is a problem. I think there are different ways to engage with media, and consuming purely for validation is a very fucked one.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wanted to see Edge of Tomorrow so bad because it looked like a cool scifi movie but my wife HATES Tom Cruise as if he'd wronged her personally. Told her he dies like 100 times. I got to see it in the theater with her.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It wouldn’t have been the worst thing in the world to see it alone though. With all due respect to your wife.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Oh, I would have gone alone and enjoyed it. But it was nice to share her catharsis.

[–] redsand 3 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Your outrage is meaningless. You're screaming into a void that either already agrees with you or doesn't give a shit.

I don't give a shit. Your argument is hollow and rings of hurt feeling and betrayal. Of the hundreds of upvotes most consume corprate media that funds worse people.

This isn't a noble grand stand, you're just butthurt and picked a popular target to hate. Manufactured transphobe Nickleback.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 hours ago

Thank you. Someone fucking gets it.

[–] Chronic_Intermission@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

J.K. Rowling is a billionaire, think about that. She has access to a resources on a scale that is unimaginable to most people and uses those considerable resources to actively harm an entire group of people, transgender people, simply for being who they are. I know I am screaming into a void with this comment to you, but the fact that what J.K. Rowling does is standard issue capitalism does not make the feelings of the OP hollow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

These people have gone off the deep end. They have no rational analysis whatsoever. They’ve never once called for an organized boycott with specific objectives; everything is on an individual level and absolutely meaningless nonsense.

One of the worst parts about the whole thing is that they are so insane that they will call you a transphobe and worse if you disagree with what they’re doing. They go around telling people to kill themselves and similar if you engage with the media. Just bottom of the barrel ghouls.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You are the Harry potter fan telling us you don't give a shit. Did the comic offend you? Your argument rings of hurt and betrayal at the reflection of reality it serves you.

I don't give a shit. Your argument that were screaming into the void is hollow and rings of hurt feelings and acknowledgment of the hurt.

This isn't a noble grand stand. Yelling at us to defend billionaires who want genocide isn't a good place to be. You're just butthurt and picking a minority group to hate.

[–] redsand 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I'm actually not a fan I just make this argument for mostly music artist often. It's the classic separate the art and artist argument.

Pirate Rowling's shit like everything else or don't watch. Either way these memes screech. There's much in this world to be obsessively angry about and what you chose is dumb. There are over 3000 billionaires and this dumb bitch's rank on that list so fucking low

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 9 hours ago (12 children)

Just don't pay for it and be done with it.

Enjoy Harry Potter, just don't give money to scumbag author.

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Read some genuinely good fiction? What do you like about them? I guarantee theres better books for that.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

As someone who did grow up with the series but doesn't interact with it anymore, I'm gonna tell you that not everyone needs things to be good.

It doesn't have to be good for you to enjoy it. Fanfiction alone wouldn't exist if it had to be good.

I don't understand this the same way I don't understand burning books you already own. It's performative but it doesn't show any actual thought.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›