this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
52 points (83.3% liked)

politics

25059 readers
1807 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nineteen states have passed legislation to make daylight saving time permanent. But those laws won't take effect until Congress makes it legal. And the medical community sees one major problem.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bottle@kbin.social 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why couldn’t you say what the medical communities issue is in the post rather than leaving some cliff hanger and making me click into the article?

Medical communities “issue”:

But the medical community has taken issue with how the bill proposes to make the change — specifically, that it mandates all states adopt permanent daylight saving time rather than sticking to standard time

Doctors and scientists argue that standard time is actually better for our health. Our internal clock is better aligned with getting light in the morning, which, in turn, sets us up for better sleep cycles.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But isn't morning figurative? You can always get up earlier. You can't get up later if you work.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

People generally sleep to around the schedule of work and school. If you change the clocks these change. Most people don't really have control.of when they wake up.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Post title is identical to the article title, which is usually good practice.

[–] Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The complaint was about the body of the post not the title. The last sentence in the body says that the medical community has a problem with the legislation but doesn't summarize what the problem is.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Oh you know I honestly didn't notice there was text in the post body, I just clicked the link. Sorry!

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Instead of making it so the sun is never overhead at noon again, couldn't we all just agree to do things an hour earlier? Surely its cheaper and less disruptive to global coordinated time keeping if we just ask Dolly to rerecord the song to be "8 to 4."

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd take "3 to 11" and just use GMT. Then none of these bickering parties have a leg to stand on anymore.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It makes the same problem though. You create some abstraction layer of "at 3 I start work". You then travel somewhere else, and you have to shift your abstraction layer again to "at 8 I start work"


or you ask "but its 3 at office X, why aren't they at work?" and then still need to shift mental times to figure out when local day/night is.

The local noon system works to ease the local abstraction shift, but makes it harder to jump to absolute times.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No mate haha... everyone uses GMT. That's the goal. No more time zones. You don't have to plan when going to another location, it's the same time everywhere. If I gotta call someone on the other side of the world, it may be dark where they are and light where I am, but it's still 4 o'clock. That's the beauty of it.

No more time zone translation, do they use time changes, if they do, which one? That's all over. You could even get rid of AM and PM and use military time so there no more confusion at all.

Yes, it would require us to get used to saying I'm working at 7 pm when it would normally be 2 pm local but that's nothing compared to the dance we're doing right now and once you've adjusted, it's done for good. How much productivity is lost when people miss phone calls or meetings because of the disparity?

Hell, I've even missed BUSINESS FLIGHTS because of this stuff and I'm not alone.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I completely understand what you're saying. It works for synchronizing well as things run on an absolute time. However, you are still going to do a localization shift, and you end right back up with time zones.

In your example, you work at 1500. Cool. I need to coordinate with Bob from Bulgaria. Its also 1500 there. Is he working? Who knows. I need to get out ye old solar map and find out. Or, I'm flying to Tokyo. My body is going to follow its diurnal cycle and want to wake up when the sun rises. We are still going to have a local abstraction of what the day hours are that shift with respect to longitude. A universal time doesn't get rid of that. I agree that flight coordinating would be easier. But, if I know I want to arrive somewhere in the morning, right now I sort by AM arrival, and boom I'm done. In a UTC system, I now have to go look up the solar morning hours for my destination sort by time, find the window I want to arrive in, and then I can be good. I still might not have a good sense of what is super early versus what is closer to middle of the day.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only issue I have with that is the date change at a reasonable hour. Especially since in California it would happen during standard business hours

[–] ares35@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

at the dmv:

"your license is expired. you have to retake the exam"

it wasn't when i got in line

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wait does your state not have a grace period for that. Mine is quite long. You have 6 months of “It’s expired but we know you probably don’t check this often, so it’s fine if you fix it quickly”

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Why is it so important that the sun is directly overhead at noon?

First of all, the sun is rarely directly overhead at noon anymore, even during standard time, because we use the same time for all the time in the time zone, so the sun is only directly overhead at noon if you are in the center of the time zone. (And even then, the sun is not always overhead at noon all the time- see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time )

Have you ever noticed that the sun is never directly overhead at noon, even when you think it should be? I doubt it.

Second of all, Noon is no longer mid-day anyway. The vast majority of people are awake for fewer hours before noon than after noon.

Permanent DST basically means that we are now considering 1PM to be mid-day, which is more compatible with most people's schedules.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

I want to point out that solar noon is the term to describe when the sun reaches its highest point in the sky.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because that's what noon means. There should at least be a chance.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Noon hasn't meant that the sun is directly overhead since November 18, 1883.

https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/november/day-of-two-noons

And technically, Ptolemy knew in the 2nd century that mean solar time and apparent solar time were different, so you could argue we have known it for nearly 1900 years.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

What is important isn't that the sun is directly overhead, just that it is "close" to overhead. Wherever you live you plan your day around the sun. Sure we have lights, and if you never go outside they are fine - but most people would agree that is a terrible life: once you accept you will go outside once in a while you want the times you go outside to be when the sun is up if possible (except astronomers who what nobody else to have those artificial lights on when it should be dark)

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the Northern Hemisphere, one can always expect the sun to be somewhat south of overhead at noontime. The close to the equator you live, the more directly overhead it will be.

The tropics is the only area on Earth where the Sun will ever be directly overhead. The sun's average position is directly over the equator and the wobble in the Earth's rotation let's it's absolute position vary about 23.5° north or south which is what defines the tropics.

[–] PrunesMakeYouPoop@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Living in the PNW, I would very much prefer to be on permanent summer ti.e, since that way fall and winter night time does not come obscenely early.

It gets very depressing to go to work when it's still dark, stay in a windowless room while it's light, minus a few short breaks, and then go home and it's already dark again.

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just don't want the sun to come up at 5am in the summer.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I honestly don’t mind that tbh. I like watching the sun rise early in the morning

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Senate passed the bill through an expedited process and with unanimous consent — legislative rarities in this day and age.

Members cited higher priorities, like a budget deficit and war in Ukraine, but there was also a growing chorus of criticism about the bill's approach (more on this below).

Even if either bill manages to pass both chambers, it'd still need to be signed by President Biden, who hasn't indicated how he leans on the issue.

This season's turnover time is 2:00 a.m. on Nov. 5, meaning residents of most states will want to move their clocks back an hour when they go to bed this Saturday.

The nation's convenience stores, for example, told a congressional subcommittee that they see an uptick in spending when clocks are set to daylight saving.

Nineteen states have actually passed measures pledging to switch to permanent daylight time if Congress changes the rules to allow for such an action.


The original article contains 765 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't some states already do their own thing? Like Arizona? What is the holdup with allowing states to go permanent DST? Each state feels daylight a little differently due to basic geographic position so why are they dragging their feet or trying to implement a blanket policy. Let each state decide.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

AZ changed long ago and got grandfathered in before Congress decided this was an inter-state trade thing they should regulate. Same for Indianna I think?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Indiana has DST now. Mitch Daniels made it part of his campaign platform for some reason.