this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
757 points (99.7% liked)

News

37060 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"Trump deports Pope" is on my bingo card.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

the Pope is American but still seems like a playable option

So when do prominent american catholics start getting excommunicated?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So they threatened the pope of the catholic church with assassination.... Thats some Israeli level shit. Is Trump even the president at this point?

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 20 points 9 hours ago

Vance already took out the last pope.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 hours ago

Does threatening The Pope and starting a war with Iran disqualify you from retaining a gold plastic FIFA Peace Prize?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 69 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

On the matter VP Vance had this to say "I think it's always a bad idea to offer an opinion on stories that are unconfirmed and uncorroborated, so I'm not going to do that."

this is coming from the "Haitians are breaking into homes to eat your pets!" guy

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Nothing reasonable about pedophile protecting fascist JD Vance. Let’s not allow them to position him as a viable leader.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago

You must be to type of person who beleives B. HUSSEIN Obama was born in the US. /s

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

The Vatican could probably wipe out just about any government on Earth if it wanted to. They've got billions of sleeper agents all over the world who'd do whatever it tells them, many of them in the very governments they want to destroy. "The US has threatened to destroy Catholicism. You know what you need to do!" and suddenly everyone from mafiosos to Irish grannies to couch fuckers would be booking flights to Mar-a-Lago.

[–] kptn_o@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 37 minutes ago

A holy crusade against the USA... THAT would be funny...

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't sound like you've met any Catholics

[–] GenChadT 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

sounds like someone has never watched the 2006 film "The Da Vinci Code", based on the 2003 Dan Brown novel of the same name

[–] III@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago

I have known too many Catholics to believe this. Unless they could wipe out these governments with passive aggressive looks.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I didn't know they had internet from whatever decade this sort of old school racism is from.

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Once again, the Protestant reformation was a huge mistake.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

gonna find out the Vatican is sitting on weapons far more powerful than nukes

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 hours ago

A stockpile of Holy Hand Grenades of Antioch?

[–] GenChadT 2 points 7 hours ago

the power of weaponized religion? ngl pretty powerful

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

"Did u even say thank you, pope?" -Vance

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

let's not forget Vance already killed the last pope by extreme cringe

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Completely understandable if you lose the will to live after meeting Vance

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The Pope met Vance and realized that there's no God, and died of a broken heart

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The last pope died shortly after meeting with Vance. Sure he had pneumonia (but felt well enough to take a meeting), but Vance could conceivably have had something on his hand that interacted with the popes diminished health. Its pure speculation of course, and no one can prove it either way and the timing is suspect, when you see them now threatening the current pope with assassination. Assassination just comes to their mind huh?

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Vance doesn't exactly look like the kind of guy who prioritizes washing his hands after a visit to the bathroom ..or couch. Who knows what he had growing under those fingernails.

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 51 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If I was the pope and meeting JD the couch fucker was in the agenda, I'd also decline. Considering what happened to the previous pope who met that turd with makeup.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago

Someone in the meeting then reportedly mentioned the Avignon Papacy to Pierre. This refers to a 14th century attack on the Vatican by the French king, in which Pope Boniface VIII was murdered by assassins and the Vatican was forced to relocate to Avignon where it could be controlled by the French crown for the next 67 years.

Sounds like they’re threatening to do to the pope what they did to Maduro.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 18 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Kinda funny considering this pope is an American.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 178 points 18 hours ago (31 children)

Threatening the POPE is EXACTLY what Jesus would Do!

-Republicans who want the Bible to be Law!

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 195 points 19 hours ago (22 children)

It is being reported by The Free Press that in the meeting [Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge] Colby told [the Vatican ambassador to the U.S.] Pierre, "The United States has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side."

well the US has now totally gone rogue.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They should excommunicate Vance

[–] sepi@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Vlad Dracul solution is better

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] gary215@thelemmy.club 12 points 13 hours ago

Nazis also had a problem with the Vatican during War World Two, What could possibly be the common reason now?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is a huge story and I'm trying to find another source that also claims threats were made.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago

https://www.newsweek.com/avignon-papacy-explained-what-reported-us-threat-to-pope-and-vatican-means-11803877

As things got heated, Colby reportedly lectured Cardinal Pierre on the military power of the U.S. and told him that the Catholic Church must pick a side, according to Hale, and mentioned the “Avignon papacy.”

All information about the meeting was obtained by Ferraresi from Vatican and U.S. officials briefed on the Pentagon meeting. What Could Such a Reference Indicate?

There is no doubt that a reference to the “Avignon papacy” by a Pentagon official was meant to make the Vatican feel uneasy about crossing the Trump administration.

Some have suggested that the reference of this chapter of medieval history might signal the Trump administration’s intention to trigger a new schism, while others think it would suggest its willingness to use military force against the Holy See. Ferraresi, however, said that interpreting it as a military threat is “just absurd.”

According to Mike Young, author of a newsletter on civic accountability, the mention of the “Avignon papacy” was a reference to “an implicit model for what happens to religious institutions that oppose state power.”

In a post on X, he wrote: “That’s not a slip of the tongue. That’s a studied historical reference deployed deliberately in a room with the Pope's senior diplomat. The message was not subtle.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 21 points 15 hours ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Missed opportunity for the Pope to rid us of the Antichrist

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

What's Peter thiel got to do with this?

load more comments
view more: next ›