this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
439 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

19830 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu 117 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you blink really fast the heat generated by your eyelids makes a very bright light that is very similar to sun rays.

Fortunately for us the 4 astronauts were very well trained with this technique so they each took turns at lighting up the moon while the others took photographs.

In other news it was probably not a good idea to call it the dark side of the moon hence why it's refer to as the far side of the moon.

Good luck with the blinking, stay hydrated.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

blink fast, heat, bright light Source? I've never heard of this before and can't fathom how that might be possible.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 46 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Hint:

Far Side ≠ Dark Side

It can be confusing because the far side of the Moon is sometimes also referred to as the Dark Side because it is "dark" to us, in the sense that we cannot see it from Earth.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, dark in the same meaning as "the dark ages." It's referring to a lack of knowledge, not a lack of light. Both these terms have fallen out of favor though.

[–] Fafa@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Did Pink Floyd lie to us?

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I get that she's an English major, but how is that an excuse to not know that cameras typically have a flash so they can illuminate the object being photographed?

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I feel like this needs a /s because people might be dumb enough to actually think a flash of some sort was used to capture these images.

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But there are no swastika shaped star bases in that Foto. As we all know the nazis are up there so this is obviously fake.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The reptilians ate all the Nazis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Philosophy dipshit here. How does a flash of light illuminate an object that big and far away?

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

pretty sure that was a joke

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 19 hours ago

I legit thought you were continuing the joke.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Didn't you know? The enlightenment spreads like an ideology. Traditional physics outplayed.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Philosophical shithead here!

A 15,000,000,000,000 bulb, of course!

But how could we know that that object illuminated by a 15,000,000,000,000 Lumen bulb is even real? For all you know, that massive object illuminated by a 15,000,000,000,000 Lumen bulb could be a fiction, a simple 15,000,000,000,000 Lumen shadow upon the wall!

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So how many shitheads does it take to change a 15,000,000,000,000 Lumen bulb?

[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago

Just one. See? I just changed it to 15,000,000,000,008 Lumen

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago

She goes by Annie now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This make me sad, English major or otherwise. I mean, you can look up at the moon and see when the far side is at least partially illuminated.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 7 points 19 hours ago

You can infer that the far side is illuminated.

pff, and she calls herself an English major...

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 19 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

But you can’t see the far side from earth…

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 21 points 23 hours ago

Right - so?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Earth isn't a source of light.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 18 points 20 hours ago

Well, it is a pretty poor indirect source. Just like the moon lighting things at night by reflecting the sun, Earth does the same.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Headcanon just explained it to her like i would explain it to my 5 year old niece. With apples or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yo I've had to explain to way too many people lately that the far side isn't "dark". When there's a new moon the light is on the other side....

[–] Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 14 hours ago

Got a friend who is a bit of a alien conspiracy nut. Shortly before Moonfall he started with the hollow moon alien base theory (I was laughing tears when I saw the trailer). He said the moon is the only satellite in our solar system that doesn't rotate and that is proof.

You should have seen his face when I demonstrated with a phone and a bottle of beer that the moon does indeed rotate once every full orbit. It got even better when I explained that one day we will loose the moon cause it very slowly drifts away from us.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is this satire, or is she genuinely confused?

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Not a joke. She has said stupider things in the past.

Tweet is real, I looked it up.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Just an english major trying to science

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 17 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm half confused. Light source - the sun, just take it when the moon is in it's new moon phase (side facing earth is dark, side facing sun is light).

But the moon is tidally locked to earth, we always see the same side, so what is taking the photo?

Artemis II visited while the far side was dark, so I guess this is an old tweet otherwise why would NASA be releasing it now?

Happy to be told I'm dumb if I got something wrong...

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 15 points 19 hours ago

What is visible isn't actually the far side, they're less than 90 degrees around to the "left."

This feature circled in red is called Grimaldi crater:

It is visible from the Earth; here is the view of the Moon you're probably used to seeing with Grimaldi again circled in red:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] commonmarmoset@reddthat.com 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“If the Naomi be Klein/ you’re doing just fine./ If the Naomi be Wolf/ Oh, buddy. Ooooof.”

Jumped a little when I saw the name.

[–] derek 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I was ignorant but curious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf

She's got a Doctorate of Philosophy in English Literature from Oxford, is a feminist author, and conspiracy theorist. At a glance I can understand why she's developed a reputation of a certain color.

Care to share any specific grievances?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh wow, I'd heard of her positively in the past, but yeah, she's really summed up as "a conspiracy theorist who found feminism first". Even where I agree with her, she's definitely not who I want representing those ideas.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

She once suggested periods happen due to vaccines. Likes complaining about 5G in her spare times too.

[–] derek 2 points 10 hours ago

Oh, buddy. Ooooof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

This is what your get when you keep referring to it as the "dark side". Ignoramuses beget ignoramuses.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›