A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
And I just wonder how many times this has happened before, but gone unnoticed or swept under the rug.
When the NSA does it it's fine.
When Facebook does it to train it's models it's fine.
When individual employees do it it's fine until the government notices and raises a stink. Then it's a problem.
Something in this article strikes me, and that is the "download" part. Downloading this data was protected by internal security checks... But what about accessing the data without downloading it? Is that fine?? How much do these employees actually have access to? Most users probably haven't enabled the message encryption.
Snapchat had similar news about misuse
These are the companies we're supposed to trust they'll implement Chat Control or similarly intrusive technologies properly.
This seems like oddly quaint news. My assumption for years has been that they are all doing the same thing.
WTF is wrong with people uploading private things on Facebook?
Most Facebook users don't know any better.
Still, it's like hiring a well known repeat sex offender to babysit your kids.
They don't know that this is a common problem. The vast majority of daily users have no knowledge that Meta is evil. They're probably not even aware of Meta as a company.
It's easy to think that this stuff is common knowledge, but just by being here you're likely way more informed about technology, politics, and privacy than 90+ percent of people.
Seems people have to relearn this lesson every few years:
If you don't want something to be public, don't put it on the internet. "Privacy" controls from these companies fail regularly, sometimes by design. If you put something on the internet, it will be public eventually.
This isn't even the first time this has happened.
Can't he just say he's using them for training his AI? That seemed to work for Meta.
If you keep your photos on someone else's computer, you get what you deserve.