this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
781 points (99.1% liked)

News

37047 readers
2705 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO and the public face of ChatGPT, has carved out an image for himself as one of the preeminent AI whisperers of our age, whose influence supposedly extends to the White House on the strength of his ideas alone.

Or at least that’s the image he’s managed to cultivate. A new exposé in the New Yorker paints a different portrait, and it’s substantially more vexing. Drawing on interviews with numerous OpenAI insiders who worked with Altman, the article portrays the CEO not as a technical wiz, but as a skilled manipulator— and one with a surprisingly shallow grasp of the AI systems his company is building.

According to numerous engineers interviewed for the article, Altman lacks experience in both programming and in machine learning — a shortage of expertise that becomes obvious when the CEO mixes up basic AI terms.

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

He's like every other CEO. Doesn't know anything about the stuff they are selling because it's built by someone else. Actually his product is for people like that. They don't need any skill to make something now. Before at least they had to buy it from us

I heard that Bezos can barely drive a delivery truck, too.

I mean come on, is it really a surprise that the role of CEO is so detached from the actual workings of a company? That's why CEOs can just hop companies without working their way up from the bottom. The role rarely has anything to do with the product or service.

[–] botanicangular@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

My CEO all up in the codebase but we are a team of 5. I do not envy his many hats.

[–] KelvarCherry@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He Can Barely Code
He can code?

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

I'm sure he gets the 'vibe'.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 6 points 17 hours ago

Classic Silicon Valley

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Sounds like his AI.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I know who is that person they are looking for, Dario, CEO of Anthropic, he can write code and knows AI.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Failing upward at an immense scale. I see this every day at work, the louder and more incompetent just keep on getting promoted. A social experiment would be to just speak whatever chatGPT vomits up loudly and confidently no matter how ignorant.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

lmao no shit.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

This should be obvious. It would be an exception if these people knew shit about fuck. Instead of just listening to them, you should maybe check what they have personally contributed to anything. What does Altman's github look like?*

They're all talk, with nothing to show. But then again, have you heard what this doorknob has to say? That we should maybe build a dyson sphere around the solar system?

*I want to believe this is his real account

https://github.com/Sam-Altman

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not defending Altman, but I’ve been a developer for 15 years and that is what my GitHub looks like too because I don’t spend my spare time programming. I wouldn’t trust a surgeon who did surgery at home. I hate this weird idea that all good developers are developing in their spare time.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The point is that he should have done something, not that he should have done it open source on free time. I threw gh there because it's the easiest place to find clues if it exists.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The point is that it’s not a good indicator of what people are capable of or what they have done. For instance all of my college classes used bitbucket instead.

Please stop making me defend this asshole.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 1 points 17 hours ago

Github or bitbucket makes no difference. If someone has something good there, that's easy to find and proves something, no?

Obviously you have to look elsewhere, like his career, if there's nothing public.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

The fact that the account is 9 years old (from long before he was famous) points to a potential for this being his real account.

[–] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

That looks a lot like my github.

I'm not a developer. I also selfhost a forgejo instance. It's not much better.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He's a sales person. Name me one sales person that was good at coding.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Bill Gates back in the 80s maybe?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

He's a finance guy, a confidence man, like Musk. That is the quality prized by society, not the ability to do anything productive.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago

Does the author not really understand what a CEO is? Don't get me wrong, Sam Altman is a piece of shit - but his coding ability has nothing to do with that.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How much longer until this goes the way of Theranos?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Hopefully not very

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

He is there to lead not read.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›