this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
-40 points (18.8% liked)

Technology

83600 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] Mudman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Ain't gonna happen.

[–] jackiechan00@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

No. Not at all.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

He can't control our future if we throw him in jail.

And people forget we can just do that, historically it would even go down as a merciful revolution. Just throw all the oligarchs and billionaires in jail, and take all their money and redistribute that.

They'll say "that's not legal" but who honestly gives a flying fuck at this point what's legal? Let em sit in jail and repeat over and over "this isn't fair" for the rest of their natural lives.

We can just do it shirt brothers, the oligarchs decided theres no more rules, so why do we let rules hold us back?

At this point it's an inevitability that it's gonna come to that point, it's just how much we put up with before it.

[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

He can't even control ChatGPT

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 11 points 1 day ago
[–] Solaris1220@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

by writing articles like this they spark the wrong discussion. extreme analogy, sorry to folks who don't do analogies: If there is a robber in a persons kitchen. Any discussion is a net negative for that homeowner. why? because the robbers presence alone is a violation of the sanctity of the home. Any and all solutions, start with the robber not being in the kitchen. Any and all discussion, adds _more time to the robber being in the kitchen All of which is a net loss for the homeowner, and potential gain for the robber.

These type's of horserace articles encourage a type of busywork discussions that waste time because they lead many of those readers away from thinking about the real / pertinent discussions to have.

[–] esc@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because the question is extremely dumb (regardless of the content of the article).

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Can He Be Trusted?

Of course. As much as all these other narcissistic assholes. IMHO he is even more power greedy than the others, but that's details.