Could be also predictive programming. Greasing people to normalise such ideas for future
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
"in a relationship" ... Whatever that means ..
Maybe instead of crying about imaginary "AI"... These people should look into why our social lives are so toxic under capitalism that a chatbot is an improvement.
Sure but 1 in 5 boys has a girlfreind that goes to a different school, you've never met her, but she's super hot.
Press X to doubt on that headline.
The article doesn't support it. My teen son's response (we're in the UK): "bullshit"
Clickbait imnsho.
Wouldnt that just make him the 4 out of 5 part?
Double X, even. One of many clickbait + "kids these days" articles.
This statstic is meaningless. They could all know the same kid in the chatbot relationship. Unlikely but still, just because "one in five" know someone who... Doesn't mean 20% of kids are in one.
"Everyone in town knows crazy Craig. He sends ChatGPT dick pics."
Of a high school of 600 people, they all know that one kid who is dating their AI, just like we knew that one kid who was emotionally attached to his anime body pillow.
I wonder how many AI-relationships it actually takes to get 20% of a network to know one of them.
I'll ask my AI boyfriend.
Waiting for some genius to calculate how many people this statistically means
Suppose the average person p~0~ has n acquaintances. Then a naive approach would say that each of p~0~’s acquaintances (call one of them p~1~) also has n acquaintances, leading p~0~ with n^2^ acquaintances of the second degree.
However, in a social network, many of p~1~’s acquaintances are shared between p~0~ and p~1~. Let’s say that r⋅n (1/n≤r≤1) of p~1~’s acquaintances are actually first-order acquaintances of p~0~. The lower limit for r is 1/n because naturally one of p~1~’s acquaintances is p~0~ themselves.
This gives us n⋅(1−p)⋅n = n^2^⋅(1−p) as the number of second-degree acquaintances, if my math is mathing. Increase n for more extraverted people in the network, and increase p for more closely-knit networks.
To model the headline X % know someone who knows, we solve 1 / [n^2^⋅(1−p)] ≥ x where x is X% expressed as a fraction. Plugging in n=100 and p = 1/10 (I pulled these numbers out of my ass) and X=20% we get 1 / [100^2^ ⋅ (1−.1))] = 1 / [ 10^4 ⋅ 0.9 ] = 1 / 900; again, if my math is mathing.
So this headline is true if about 1 in 900 people are in a relationship with AI.
Someone who is under the delusion that they’re in a relationship with an AI chatbot
Sample size of "over 1 thousand", feels meaningfully meaningless.