this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
37 points (82.5% liked)

Canada

10318 readers
952 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During the 2015 election campaign, Justin Trudeau vowed that his government would never purchase the F-35.

As prime minister, Trudeau continued to point out the Canadian military had no need for the F-35. “Canadians know full well that, for 10 years, the Conservatives completely missed the boat when it came to delivering to Canadians and their armed forces the equipment they needed,” Trudeau said in June 2016. “They clung to an aircraft (the F-35) that does not work and is far from working.”

The Liberal government also noted the F-35’s “stealth first-strike capability” was not needed to defend Canada.

But Trudeau flipped on his election promise, not only committing to the purchase but increasing the number of jets from the 65 the Conservatives had wanted to buy to 88.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

username checks out

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who would win (funding)?

  • A high speed rail project between Quebec City and Windsor 🚅
  • Some wooshy bois 🛩
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not both? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I figure from a back of the napkin-level math over a comparable service life the two projects would be within an order of magnitude of each other in today's dollars.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Total program costs end up being ~$18M/yr per plane for 45 years. Not horrible for a 5th gen fighter.
Still not cheap.

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is actually news in reverse. Considering present world situation (Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan in the works) and the fact that between election in 2016 and now situation is absolutely and categorically different, Canada does need modern fleet. War in Ukraine highlighted all of the weaknesses of old equipment as well as prompted NATO members to be ready to depmoy forces outside of their own borders (yes, russia won't be attacking Canada, but it may attack nearby NATO states and Canada will have to step in. Sending our pilots for slaughter under those conditions is wreckless).

While I'm no fan of JT and his flipping on promisses, this time I think there's credit due. Article title should've read: "Canadian government reacted to military escalations around the globe by moving forward with fleet upgrade". We can debate what should fleet be upgraded to, but the fact that it has to be upgraded is obvious.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the article headline should be "Speech loving PM actually makes good call and reverses decision to not buy F-35s".

Particularly now that the jet is looking less like a lemon, and that it's function of being an intelligence sharing hub to drones and smart missiles seems to be looking more and more critical.

It does seem like investing in disposable kill drones is maybe the best route right now for military spending?

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

if anything, war in Ukraine has shown that it's not all about big equipment if you want to hold position, but to move, you need heavy stuff

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

On the Ukrainian side, one of the issues they're running into, as far as I understand it, is long range missiles being fired from jets inside Russian territory.

From my understanding, firing and guiding long range missiles is exactly what the F-35
Is good at.

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that too. So no matter how you slice it we do need those jets. Couple of years ago I'd be arguing otherwise.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Hell, I'd have been right there with you.

[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Wondering if waiting/delaying the eventual purchase of F-35 ended up being more expensive for Canada overall? Or did it become less expensive per "plane" (including servicing/maintenance contract, training, etc.) considering the manufacturing processes have been streamlined since then?

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is fine and expected, media just loves to run a headline with a big number to farm clicks. There is no real news here.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Few military assets are more expensive than fighter jets. Our CF-18s are verging on obsolete and the costs of just keeping them in the air is ballooning as every single part of them are going beyond their operational lives.

We basically won't have an air fleet in 2 decades if we don't buy the F-35s now, and trying to refurbish the CF-18s while we hold out for the next generation or something will cost us tens of billions in refurbishment and maintenance fees alone while running an air fleet that can only keep up with 3rd rate air forces. Even if we can somehow hold on until a newer and more cost effective jet comes to market, any discount we can get from that will be nothing compared to the extra cost of keeping the CF-18s running. Not to mention the pure reduction in capacity in the meantime. We still have to patrol the north, and anything we use for that can't be spending weeks under maintenance between sorties.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Québec city wanted to build a simple trawmay in the city, nothing fancy. Cost was quoted 10-12 billion $.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gee, if only we had election reform to help us get a better leader.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yet another promise he broke. Not that I believe any promises politicians make.

[–] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

He didn't buy it in that election, and frankly its warranted now. China and Israel seem to be angling for WW3 from the opposite sides.