Sadly, I'm not too surprised. Check this shit out, published back in November 2025: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.25137.
"We simulated 151 million American workers [using LLMs] to see what proportion of tasks they do that can also be done by AI".
Much more recently, Esquire couldn't get ahold of an actor for an interview and so decided to generate the actors responses using Claude: https://esquiresg.com/mackenyu-one-piece-roronoa-zoro-interview/.
We had the photospread, but nothing directly uttered by the 29-year-old. With a driving need for a feature, we had to be inventive. Harnessing our creative license, we pulled his verbatim from previous interviews and fed them through an AI programme to formulate new responses.
Are these the words we expect from Mackenyu? Or are they just replies from an echo chamber of celebrity-hood that we want to believe is from him?
With the absence of information, can new insights be gained?
Nature abhors a vacuum, and in its place, a story fills the hollow.
Somehow it is currently accepted by a certain portion of people that LLM-based systems can be used to replace actually existing human beings.
