this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
866 points (99.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16306 readers
1320 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

This might be the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 2 hours ago

Why bother asking people when you can just ask AI to make answers.

[–] miggy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I could go even cheaper by just thinking about it really hard and guessing

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Hey at least this is one poll result rather than zero

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

honestly it'd probably be better unless you're actively hallucinating bullshit

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 21 points 13 hours ago

Any scientific publications accidentally posting an article not based on the actual scientific method should be immediately punished by law or we are lost. It's time they used the hordes of money they accumulated during the easy part to now prove themselves and perform their actual function in society.

[–] aizawaA02@lemmy.zip 13 points 13 hours ago

So it’s just another scam.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago

What the actual fuck??

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 50 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

You beat me to it. I was going to comment that this is literally the stupidest shit I have ever heard in my goddamn life.

[–] molten@lemmy.world 77 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Technically, these are damned lies because they've been summarized.

[–] null@lemmy.org 48 points 20 hours ago
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Crossposting to fuck_ai if you don't mind.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 211 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Great, so now they're outsourcing our own fucking opinions to them

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 134 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This just in: 95% of poll respondents think tech bro oligarchy is a really swell idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait till these Silicon Sampling reports start popping up in election exit-polls.

We're going to get levels of "Proven Election Fraud" and "Illegal Immigrant Voter Invasion" hysteria the likes of which you've never seen.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (8 children)

We are living through a great filter event and we aren’t going to come through the other side

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] T156@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Should just have it handle voting as well. They could call it Automatic Democracy.

None of that pesky informed voting, you can just instruct an AI company on what your stance is, and it'll vote in your stead.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago

Funny thing, every now and then someone makes these questionnaire websites where you answer questions about policy and it tells you which party is most in alignment. Pretty much universally most people turn out to be more to the left than their voting history and intentions would suggest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Holy fuck. It can simulate large samplings or it can just hallucinate some nonsensical BS that completely misinterprets the data it gathers in order to agree with the phrasing of the person who created the prompt.

Do the majority of people trust their doctors and nurses? Maybe. Or, maybe it depends on the context of the question.

Do I trust my doctors and nurses are a better source of information than random internet advice and AI generated slop? I would hope so.

Do I trust that the American healthcare system is set up to prioritize the health and well-being of the patient over maximizing profits and forcing healthcare workers to adhere to standardized time allotments of 10 to 15 minutes for every patient interaction regardless of the individual case? Absolutely not.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Yep. AI, such as it is, can be useful for some things. I had had a song kinda stuck in my head for years, couldn't remember the lyrics, artist, or song name - only that it was in french and done stuff from the video. ChatGPT worked it out quickly. On the other hand, I was using it to look up definitions for a legal case I'm kinda involved in that hasn't really happened before - I know I shouldn't, but I'm not a lawyer! - and I found it was using my own case which has not been decided as evidence.

So yeah, they can be impressive but you can't trust these programmes with anything important.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 42 points 21 hours ago

I have an environment friendly alternative to this method. It involves tea leaves…

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 77 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Is there a community for cataloging tech bullshit like "silicon sampling"? If not I'll make one. First thought c/techbrobabble

EDIT: 'tis done !techbrobabble@piefed.blahaj.zone

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I hope you're ready to be the only poster until the community catches on, and then that you're ready to play moderator. best of luck

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 19 hours ago

Thanks! This was a spur of the moment decision, but I have thought about moderating a comm for a while. This seems like a good candidate to start with as I have a decades-long back catalogue of tech nonsense to draw from, I'll probably sit down an write out a list sometime this week and plan some posts out. At one post a day I bet I could keep it going myself for a few months, before I take into account the eternal firehose of techbrobabble I drink from every day lol.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 139 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know what else costs a fraction of traditional polling and takes a fraction of the time?

Lying, making shit up. Which conveniently is basically what AI slop does, and having a person lie is even cheaper than licensing some random AI to do it.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ah, but licensing the AI lets you blame the AI when it inevitably blows up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

You wouldn’t know my survey results, she goes to another school

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 36 points 23 hours ago

It costs less to make shit up that "mimics" the real information. Who would have thought

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 11 points 18 hours ago
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Misleading title, Axios did not do this, but rather the referenced a study that they later discovered did this.

It’s on them for not learning this sooner, but let’s not act like they’re the ones who sent it up to try and manipulate political reporting.

load more comments (1 replies)

Cool, so everything is just fucking made up now. Why even bother with the AI at that point? Just make up stats that say what you want right there on the spot. Its the same fucking different. Bullshit from humans or bullshit from AI, its all still bullshit.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“opinions” formed from a mix of stolen books and movie scripts, terminally online shutins and fanfic writers, and politics comment sections cannot be considered a holistic look at humanity.

We’re absolutely going extinct. I’m out of hope at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Kinda sounds like numbers pulled out of your ass…

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

63% of all statistics are made up on the spot

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] warbosstodd@piefed.social 16 points 23 hours ago

Unfucking believable that a legitimate media outlet would do such a thing. That’s some Breitbart shit.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago

Well this might go a ways in explaining why polling has been so off in the last few years.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I relate to these the same as almost any poll.

load more comments
view more: next ›